Isaac Watts; his life and writings, his homes and friendsHood, Edwin Paxton
Religion
Isaac Watts; his life and writings, his homes and friends
Hood, Edwin Paxton
Watts, Isaac, 1674-1748
the retina, conveying itself by the optic nerves into the
common sensory without confusion? Can a rational being survey
this scene and say there is no God? Can a mind think on this
stupendous bodily organ, the eye, and not adore the Wisdom that
contrived it?”
And the following is not only most interesting, but anticipates, with
much strength, a line of argument important to the sceptical philosophy
of our own day. The German Buchner binds up his atheistic philosophy
between the two covers of Force and Matter; and many in our own country
follow in the same train of singularly forgetful thought: forgetful
because force and matter are really not sufficient to constitute a
universe; the regulative and directive power which controls force and
manipulates matter to its will is assuredly as essential a factor as
either force or matter.[54] Thus Dr. Watts argues in his remarks:
THE DIRECTION OF MOTION A PROOF OF DEITY.
“Yet, after all, I know it may be replied again, that
gravitation is a power which is not limited in its agency by
any conceivable distances whatsoever; and therefore, when
these starbeams are run out never so far into the infinite
void by the force of their emission from the star, yet their
gravitation towards the star, or some of the planetary worlds,
which sometimes, perhaps, may be nearer to it, has perpetual
influence to retard their motion by degrees, even as the
motion of a comet is retarded by its gravitation towards the
sun, though it flies to such a prodigious distance from the
sun, and in time it is stopped and drawn back again and made
to return towards its centre. And just so, may we suppose,
all the sunbeams and starbeams that ever were emitted, even
to the borders of the creation, to have been restrained by
degrees by this principle of gravitation till, moving slower
and slower, at last they are stopped in their progress and made
to return toward their own or some other planetary system.
And if so, then there is a perpetual return of the beams of
light towards some or other of their bright originals, an
everlasting circulation of these lucid atoms, which will hinder
this eternal dilation of the bounds of the universe, and at the
same time will equally prevent the wasting of the substance
of the lucid bodies, the sun or stars. Well, but if this
power of restraining and reducing the flight of starbeams be
ascribed to this principle of gravitation, let us inquire what
is this gravitation, which prevents the universe from such a
perpetual waste of light? It cannot be supposed to be any real
property or natural power inhering in matter or body, which
exerts its influence at so prodigious a distance. I think,
therefore, it is generally agreed, and with great reason, that
it is properly the influence of a Divine power upon every atom
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account