Isis unveiled, Volume 1 (of 2), Science : $b A master-key to mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 1 (of 2), Science : $b A master-key to mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
The lotus is the product of fire (heat) and water, hence the dual
symbol of spirit and matter. The God Brahma is the second person of the
Trinity, as are Jehovah (Adam-Kadmon) and Osiris, or rather Pimander,
or the Power of the Thought Divine, of Hermes; for it is Pimander who
represents the root of all the Egyptian Sun-gods. The Eternal is the
Spirit of Fire, which stirs up and fructifies and develops into a
concrete form everything that is born of water or the primordial earth,
evolved out of Brahma; but the universe is itself Brahma, and he is the
universe. This is the philosophy of Spinoza, which he derived from that
of Pythagoras; and it is the same for which Bruno died a martyr. How
much Christian theology has gone astray from its point of departure,
is demonstrated in this historical fact. Bruno was slaughtered for the
exegesis of a symbol that was adopted by the earliest Christians, and
expounded by the apostles! The sprig of water-lilies of Bhôdisât, and
later of Gabriel, typifying fire and water, or the idea of creation
and generation, is worked into the earliest dogma of the baptismal
sacrament.
Bruno’s and Spinoza’s doctrines are nearly identical, though the words
of the latter are more veiled, and far more cautiously chosen than
those to be found in the theories of the author of the _Causa Principio
et Uno_, or the _Infinito Universo e Mondi_. Both Bruno, who confesses
that the source of his information was Pythagoras, and Spinoza, who,
without acknowledging it as frankly, allows his philosophy to betray
the secret, view the First Cause from the same standpoint. With them,
God is an Entity totally _per se_, an Infinite Spirit, and the only
Being utterly free and independent of either effects or other causes;
who, through that same Will which produced all things and gave the
first impulse to every cosmic law, perpetually keeps in existence and
order everything in the universe. As well as the Hindu Swâbhávikas,
erroneously called Atheists, who assume that all things, men as well as
gods and spirits, were born from Swabhâva, or their own nature,[180] {94}
both Spinoza and Bruno were led to the conclusion that _God is to
be sought for within nature and not without_. For, creation being
proportional to the power of the Creator, the universe as well as its
Creator must be infinite and eternal, one form emanating from its own
essence, and creating in its turn another. The modern commentators
affirm that Bruno, “_unsustained by the hope of another and better
world_, still surrendered his life rather than his convictions;”
thereby allowing it to be inferred that Giordano Bruno had no belief in
the continued existence of man after death. Professor Draper asserts
most positively that Bruno did not believe in the immortality of the
soul. Speaking of the countless victims of the religious intolerance
of the Popish Church, he remarks: “The passage from this life to the
next, though through a hard trial, was the passage from a transient
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account