Isis unveiled, Volume 1 (of 2), Science : $b A master-key to mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 1 (of 2), Science : $b A master-key to mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
But for the opportune appearance of Berti’s authoritative work, we
would have continued to revere Bruno as a martyr, whose bust was
deservedly set high in the Pantheon of Exact Science, crowned with
laurel by the hand of Draper. But now we see that their hero of an {98}
hour is neither atheist, materialist, nor positivist, but simply
a Pythagorean who taught the philosophy of Upper Asia, and claimed
to possess the powers of the magicians, so despised by Draper’s own
school! Nothing more amusing than this _contretemps_ has happened
since the supposed statue of St. Peter was discovered by irreverent
archæologists to be nothing else than the Jupiter of the Capitol, and
Buddha’s identity with the Catholic St. Josaphat was satisfactorily
proven.
Thus, search where we may through the archives of history, we find that
there is no fragment of modern philosophy—whether Newtonian, Cartesian,
Huxleyian or any other—but has been dug from the Oriental mines. Even
Positivism and Nihilism find their prototype in the exoteric portion
of Kapila’s philosophy, as is well remarked by Max Müller. It was the
inspiration of the Hindu sages that penetrated the mysteries of Praguâ
Pâramitâ (perfect wisdom); their hands that rocked the cradle of the
first ancestor of that feeble but noisy child that we have christened
MODERN SCIENCE.
CHAPTER IV. {99}
“I choose the nobler part of Emerson, when, after various
disenchantments, he exclaimed, ‘I covet Truth.’ The gladness of
true heroism visits the heart of him who is really competent to
say this.”
—TYNDALL.
“A testimony is sufficient when it rests on:
1st. A great number of very sensible witnesses who agree in having
seen well.
2d. Who are sane, bodily and mentally.
3d. Who are impartial and disinterested.
4th. Who unanimously agree.
5th. Who solemnly certify to the fact.”—VOLTAIRE, _Dictionnaire
Philosophique_.
The Count Agenor de Gasparin is a devoted Protestant. His battle with
des Mousseaux, de Mirville and other fanatics who laid the whole of
the spiritual phenomena at the door of Satan, was long and fierce.
Two volumes of over fifteen hundred pages are the result, proving the
_effects_, denying the _cause_, and employing superhuman efforts to
invent every other possible explanation that could be suggested rather
than the true one.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account