Isis unveiled, Volume 1 (of 2), Science : $b A master-key to mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 1 (of 2), Science : $b A master-key to mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
That was a cutting insult to the Academicians, to be sure; but ever
since 1850 they seem to have been doomed to suffer in their pride
more than most of them can bear. The idea of asking the attention of
the forty “Immortals” to the pranks of the Devil! They vowed revenge,
and, leaguing themselves together, propounded a theory which exceeded
in absurdity even de Mirville’s demonolatry! Dr. Royer and Jobart de
Lamballe—both celebrities in their way—formed an alliance and presented
to the Institute a German whose cleverness afforded, according to
his statement, the key to all the knockings and rappings of both
hemispheres. “We blush” remarks the Marquis de Mirville—“to say that
the whole of the trick consisted simply in the reiterated displacement
of one of the muscular tendons of the legs. Great demonstration of the
system in full sitting of the Institute—and on the spot ... expressions
of Academical gratitude for this _interesting_ communication, and, a
few days later, a full assurance given to the public by a professor of {103}
the medical faculty, that, scientists having pronounced their opinion,
the mystery was at last unravelled!“[192]
But such _scientific_ explanations neither prevented the phenomenon
from quietly following its course, nor the two writers on demonology
from proceeding to expound their strictly orthodox theories.
Denying that the Church had anything to do with his books, des
Mousseaux gravely gave the Academy, in addition to his _Mémoire_, the
following interesting and profoundly philosophical thoughts on Satan:
“_The Devil is the chief pillar of Faith._ He is one of the grand
personages whose life is closely allied to that of the church; and
without his speech which issued out so triumphantly from the mouth of
the Serpent, _his medium_, the fall of man could not have taken place.
Thus, if it was not for him, the Saviour, the Crucified, the Redeemer,
would be but the most ridiculous of supernumeraries, and the Cross an
insult to good sense!”[193]
This writer, be it remembered, is only the faithful echo of the church,
which anathematizes equally the one who denies God and him who doubts
the objective existence of Satan.
But the Marquis de Mirville carries this idea of God’s partnership with
the Devil still further. According to him it is a regular commercial
affair, in which the senior “silent partner” suffers the active
business of the firm to be transacted as it may please his junior
associate, by whose audacity and industry he profits. Who could be of
any other opinion, upon reading the following?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account