Isis unveiled, Volume 1 (of 2), Science : $b A master-key to mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 1 (of 2), Science : $b A master-key to mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
“Now,” asks de Mirville, “what are we to believe of the Americans, and
their _thousands of mediums_ who produce the same raps before millions
of witnesses?” “_Ventriloquism_, to be sure,” answers Babinet. “But how
can you explain such an impossibility?” The easiest thing in the world;
listen only: “All that was necessary to produce the first manifestation
in the _first house_ in America was, a street-boy knocking at the door
of a mystified citizen, perhaps with a leaden ball attached to a {106}
string, and if Mr. Weekman (the first believer in America) (?)[200]
when he watched for the third time, heard no shouts of laughter in the
street, it is because of the essential difference which exists between
a French street-Arab, and an English or Trans-Atlantic one, the latter
being amply provided with what we call a _sad merriment_, ”_gaité
triste_.”[201]
Truly says de Mirville in his famous reply to the attacks of de
Gasparin, Babinet, and other scientists: “and thus according to our
great physicist, _the tables turn_ very quickly, very energetically,
resist likewise, and, as M. de Gasparin has proved, they _levitate
without contact_. Said a minister: ‘With three words of a man’s
handwriting, I take upon myself to have him hung.’ With the above three
lines, we take upon ourselves, in our turn, to throw into the greatest
confusion the physicists of all the globe, or rather to revolutionize
the world—if at least, M. de Babinet had taken the precaution of
suggesting, like M. de Gasparin, some yet unknown law or force. For
this would cover the whole ground.”[C]
But it is in the notes embracing the “facts and physical theories,”
that we find the acme of the consistency and logic of Babinet as an
expert investigator on the field of Spiritualism.
It would appear, that M. de Mirville in his narrative of the wonders
manifested at the _Presbytere de Cideville_,[202] was much struck
by the marvellousness of some facts. Though authenticated before
the inquest and magistrates, they were of so miraculous a nature
as to force the demonological author himself to shrink from the
responsibility of publishing them.
These facts were as follows: “At the precise moment _predicted_ by
a _sorcerer_” a case of revenge—“a violent clap of thunder was heard
above one of the chimneys of the presbytery, after which the _fluid_
descended with a formidable noise through that passage, threw down
believers as well as skeptics (as to the power of the sorcerer) who
were warming themselves by the fire; and, having filled the room with a
multitude of _fantastic animals_, returned to the chimney, and having
reascended it, disappeared, after producing the same terrible noise.”
“As,” adds de Mirville, “we were already but too rich in facts, we
recoiled before this new enormity added to so many others.”[203]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account