Isis unveiled, Volume 1 (of 2), Science : $b A master-key to mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 1 (of 2), Science : $b A master-key to mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
And now, a very natural question is suggested. How did Paracelsus
come to learn anything of the composition of the stars, when, till a
very recent period—till the discovery of the spectroscope in fact—the
constituents of the heavenly bodies were utterly unknown to our learned {169}
academies? And even now, notwithstanding tele-spectroscope and other
very important modern improvements, except a few elements and a
hypothetical chromosphere, everything is yet a mystery for them in the
stars. Could Paracelsus have been so sure of the nature of the starry
host, unless he had means of which science knows nothing? Yet knowing
nothing she will not even hear pronounced the very names of these
means, which are—hermetic philosophy and alchemy.
We must bear in mind, moreover, that _Paracelsus was the discoverer
of hydrogen, and knew well all its properties and composition_ long
before any of the orthodox academicians ever thought of it; that he had
studied astrology and astronomy, as all the fire-philosophers did; and
that, if he did assert that man is in a direct affinity with the stars,
he knew well what he asserted.
The next point for the physiologists to verify is his proposition that
the nourishment of the body comes not merely through the stomach,
“but also imperceptibly through the magnetic force, which resides in
all nature and by which every individual member draws its specific
nourishment to itself.” Man, he further says, draws not only health
from the elements when in equilibrium, but also disease when they are
disturbed. Living bodies are subject to the laws of attraction and
chemical affinity, as science admits; the most remarkable physical
property of organic tissues, according to physiologists, is the
property of _imbibition_. What more natural, then, than this theory
of Paracelsus, that this absorbent, attractive, and chemical body of
ours gathers into itself the astral or sidereal influences? “The sun
and the stars attract from us to themselves, and we again from them to
us.” What objection can science offer to this? What it is that we give
off, is shown in Baron Reichenbach’s discovery of the odic emanations
of man, which are identical with flames from magnets, crystals, and in
fact from all vegetable organisms.
The unity of the universe was asserted by Paracelsus, who says that
“the human body is possessed of primeval stuff (or cosmic matter); the
spectroscope has proved the assertion by showing that the same chemical
elements which exist upon earth and in the sun, are also found in all
the stars. The spectroscope does more: it shows that all the stars are
_suns_, similar in constitution to our own;[296] and as we are told by
Professor Mayer,[297] that the magnetic condition of the earth changes
with every variation upon the sun’s surface, and is said to be “in {170}
subjection to _emanations_ from the sun,” the stars being suns must
also give off emanations which affect us in proportionate degrees.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account