Isis unveiled, Volume 1 (of 2), Science : $b A master-key to mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 1 (of 2), Science : $b A master-key to mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
The experiments of Mesmer were vastly improved upon by the Marquis
de Puysegur, who entirely dispensed with apparatus and produced {174}
remarkable cures among the tenants of his estate at Busancy. These
being given to the public, many other educated men experimented with
like success, and in 1825 M. Foissac proposed to the Academy of
Medicine to institute a new inquiry. A special committee, consisting of
Adelon, Parisey, Marc, Burdin, sen., with Husson as reporter, united
in a recommendation that the suggestion should be adopted. They make
the manly avowal that “in science no decision whatever is absolute
and irrevocable,” and afford us the means to estimate the value which
should be attached to the conclusions of the Franklin committee of
1784, by saying that “the experiments on which this judgment was
founded appeared to have been conducted without the simultaneous and
necessary assembling together of all the commissioners, and _also with
moral predispositions_, which, according to the principles of the
fact which they were appointed to examine, _must cause their complete
failure_.”
What they say concerning magnetism as a secret remedy, has been said
many times by the most respected writers upon modern Spiritualism,
namely: “It is the duty of the Academy to study it, to subject it to
trials; finally, to take away the use and practice of it from persons
quite strangers to the art, who abuse this means, and make it an object
of lucre and speculation.”
This report provoked long debates, but in May, 1826, the Academy
appointed a commission which comprised the following illustrious
names: Leroux, Bourdois de la Motte, Double, Magendie, Guersant,
Husson, Thillaye, Marc, Itard, Fouquier, and Guénau de Mussy. They
began their labors immediately, and continued them five years,
communicating, through Monsieur Husson, to the Academy the results
of their observations. The report embraces accounts of phenomena
classified under thirty-four different paragraphs, but as this work is
not specially devoted to the science of magnetism, we must be content
with a few brief extracts. They assert that neither contact of the
hands, frictions, nor passes are invariably needed, since, on several
occasions, the will, fixedness of stare, have sufficed to produce
magnetic phenomena, even without the knowledge of the magnetized.
“Well-attested and therapeutical phenomena” depend on magnetism alone,
and are not reproduced without it. The state of somnambulism exists
and “occasions the development of new faculties, which have received
the denominations of _clairvoyance_, intuition, internal prevision.”
Sleep (the magnetic) has “been excited under circumstances where those
magnetized could not see, and were entirely ignorant of the means
employed to occasion it. The magnetizer, having once controlled his
subject, may “put him completely into somnambulism, take him out of
it without his knowledge, out of his sight, at a certain distance,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account