Isis unveiled, Volume 1 (of 2), Science : $b A master-key to mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 1 (of 2), Science : $b A master-key to mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
can that body cast that is a pure and transparent light, such as the
ethereal vehicle is? And therefore that oracle is then fulfilled, when
the soul has ascended into that condition we have already described, in
which alone it is out of the reach of fate and mortality.” He concludes
his work by stating that this transcendent and divinely-pure condition
was the only aim of the Pythagoreans.
As to the skeptics of his age, his language is contemptuous and severe.
Speaking of Scot, Adie, and Webster, he terms them “our new inspired
saints ... sworn advocates of the witches, who thus madly and boldly,
against all sense and reason, against all antiquity, all interpreters,
and against the Scripture itself, will have even no Samuel in the
scene, but a confederate knave! Whether the Scripture, or these inblown
buffoons, puffed up with nothing but ignorance, vanity, and stupid
infidelity, are to be believed, let any one judge,” he adds.[342]
What kind of language would this eminent divine have used against our
skeptics of the nineteenth century?
Descartes, although a worshipper of matter, was one of the most devoted
teachers of the magnetic doctrine and, in a certain sense, even of
Alchemy. His system of physics was very much like that of other great
philosophers. Space, which is infinite, is composed, or rather filled
up with a fluid and elementary matter, and is the sole fountain of all {207}
life, enclosing all the celestial globes and keeping them in perpetual
motion. The magnet-streams of Mesmer are disguised by him into the
Cartesian vortices, and both rest on the same principle. Ennemoser does
not hesitate to say that both have more in common “than people suppose,
who have not carefully examined the subject.”[343]
The esteemed philosopher, Pierre Poiret Naudé, was the warmest defender
of the doctrines of occult magnetism and its first propounders,[344]
in 1679. The magico-theosophical philosophy is fully vindicated in his
works.
The well-known Dr. Hufeland has written a work on magic[345] in which
he propounds the theory of the universal magnetic sympathy between men,
animals, plants, and even minerals. The testimony of Campanella, Van
Helmont, and Servius, is confirmed by him in relation to the sympathy
existing between the different parts of the body as well as between the
parts of all organic and even inorganic bodies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account