Isis unveiled, Volume 1 (of 2), Science : $b A master-key to mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 1 (of 2), Science : $b A master-key to mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
which make one divine age or Maha-yug; seventy-one Maha-yugs make
306,720,000 years, to which is added a sandhi (or the time when day and
night border on each other, morning and evening twilight), equal to
a Satya-yug, 1,728,000, make a manwantara of 308,448,000 years;[101]
fourteen manwantaras make 4,318,272,000 years; to which must be added a
sandhi to begin the kalpa, 1,728,000 years, making the kalpa or grand
period of 4,320,000,000 of years. As we are now only in the Kali-yug of
the twenty-eighth age of the seventh manwantara of 308,448,000 years,
we have yet sufficient time before us to wait before we reach even half
of the time allotted to the world.
These ciphers are not fanciful, but founded upon actual astronomical
calculations, as has been demonstrated by S. Davis.[102] Many a
scientist, Higgins among others, notwithstanding their researches,
has been utterly perplexed as to which of these was the _secret_
cycle. Bunsen has demonstrated that the Egyptian priests, who made the
cyclic notations, kept them always in the profoundest mystery.[103]
Perhaps their difficulty arose from the fact that the calculations of
the ancients applied equally to the spiritual progress of humanity
as to the physical. It will not be difficult to understand the close
correspondence drawn by the ancients between the cycles of nature
and of mankind, if we keep in mind their belief in the constant and
all-potent influences of the planets upon the fortunes of humanity.
Higgins justly believed that the cycle of the Indian system, of
432,000, is the true key of the secret cycle. But his failure in trying
to decipher it was made apparent; for as it pertained to the mystery
of the creation, this cycle was the most inviolable of all. It was
repeated in symbolic figures only in the Chaldean _Book of Numbers_, {33}
the original of which, if now extant, is certainly not to be found in
libraries, as it formed one of the most ancient Books of Hermes,[104]
the number of which is at present undetermined.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account