Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
up for not caring that her sister hath left her “to serve alone.”[157]
From the birth of the solemn and majestic conception of the
unrevealed Deity of the ancient adepts to such caricatured
descriptions of him who died on the Cross for his philanthropic
devotion to humanity, long centuries have intervened, and their
heavy tread seems to have almost entirely obliterated all sense of
a spiritual religion from the hearts of his professed followers. No
wonder then, that the sentence of Proclus is no longer understood by
the Christians, and is rejected as a “vagary” by the materialists,
who, in their negation, are less blasphemous and atheistical than
many of the reverends and members of the churches. But, although the
Greek _epoptai_ are no more, we have now, in our own age, a people
far more ancient than the oldest Hellenes, who practice the so-called
“preterhuman” gifts to the same extent as did their ancestors far
earlier than the days of Troy. It is to this people that we draw the
attention of the psychologist and philosopher.
One need not go very deep into the literature of the Orientalists to
become convinced that in most cases they do not even suspect that
in the arcane philosophy of India there are depths which they have
not sounded, and _cannot_ sound, for they pass on without perceiving
them. There is a pervading tone of conscious superiority, a ring
of contempt in the treatment of Hindu metaphysics, as though the
European mind is alone enlightened enough to polish the rough diamond
of the old Sanscrit writers, and separate right from wrong for the
benefit of their descendants. We see them disputing over the external
forms of expression without a conception of the great vital truths
these hide from the profane view.
“As a rule, the Brahmans,” says Jacolliot, “rarely go beyond the
class of _grihesta_ [priests of the vulgar castes] and _purohita_
[exorcisers, divines, prophets, and evocators of spirits]. And
yet, we shall see ... once that we have touched upon the question
and study of manifestations and phenomena, that these initiates
of the _first_ degree (the lowest) attribute to themselves, and
in appearance possess faculties developed to a degree which has
never been equalled in Europe. As to the initiates of the second
and especially of the third category, they pretend to be enabled to
ignore time, space, and to command life and death.”[158]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account