Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
The baptism was changed from _water_ to that of the Holy Ghost,
undoubtedly in consequence of the ever-dominant idea of the Fathers
to institute a reform, and make the Christians distinct from St.
John’s Nazarenes, the Nabatheans and Ebionites, in order to make
room for new dogmas. Not only do the Synoptics tell us that Jesus
was baptizing the same as John, but John’s own disciples complained
of it, though surely Jesus cannot be accused of following a purely
Bacchic rite. The parenthesis in verse 2d of John iv., “... though
Jesus himself baptized not,” is so clumsy as to show upon its face
that it is an interpolation. Matthew makes John say that he that
should come after him would not baptize them with water “but with
_the Holy Ghost_ and fire.” Mark, Luke, and John corroborate these
words. Water, fire, and spirit, or Holy Ghost, have all their origin
in India, as we will show.
Now there is one very strange peculiarity about this sentence. It
is flatly denied in _Acts_ xix. 2-5. Apollos, a Jew of Alexandria,
belonged to the sect of St. John’s disciples; he had been baptized,
and instructed others in the doctrines of the Baptist. And yet when
Paul, cleverly profiting by his absence at Corinth, finds certain
disciples of Apollos’ at Ephesus, and asks them whether they received
_the Holy Ghost_, he is naïvely answered, “We have not so much as
heard whether there be any Holy Ghost!” “Unto what then were you
baptized?” he inquires. “_Unto John’s baptism_,” they say. Then Paul
is made to repeat the words attributed to John by the Synoptics; and
these men “were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus,” exhibiting,
moreover, at the same instant, the usual polyglot gift which
accompanies the descent of the Holy Ghost.
How then? St. John the Baptist, who is called the “precursor,” that
“the prophecy might be fulfilled,” the great prophet and martyr,
whose words ought to have had such an importance in the eyes of his
disciples, announces the “Holy Ghost” to his listeners; causes crowds
to assemble on the shores of the Jordan, where, at the great ceremony
of Christ’s baptism, the promised “Holy Ghost” appears within the
opened heavens, and the multitude hears the voice, and yet there are
disciples of St. John who have “never so much as _heard_ whether
there be any Holy Ghost!”
Verily the disciples who wrote the _Codex Nazaræus_ were right.
Only it is not Jesus himself, but those who came after him, and who
concocted the _Bible_ to suit themselves, that “_perverted_ John’s
doctrine, _changed_ the baptism of the Jordan, and perverted the
sayings of justice.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account