Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
A very startling bit of information that, when, before arriving
at the book of _Exodus_, we are told in _Genesis_ (xxii. 14) that
“Abraham called the name of that place”--where the patriarch
had been preparing to cut the throat of his only-begotten
son--“JEHOVAH-jireh!” (Jehovah sees.) Which is the inspired
text?--both cannot be--which the forgery?
Now, if both Abraham and Moses had not belonged to the same holy
group, we might, perhaps, help theologians by suggesting to them
a convenient means of escape out of this dilemma. They ought to
call the reverend Jesuit Fathers--especially those who have been
missionaries in India--to their rescue. The latter would not be for
a moment disconcerted. They would coolly tell us that beyond doubt
Abraham had heard the name of Jehovah and _borrowed_ it from Moses.
Do they not maintain that it was they who invented the _Sanscrit_,
edited _Manu_, and composed the greater portion of the _Vedas?_
Marcion maintained, with the other Gnostics, the fallaciousness of
the idea of an incarnate God, and therefore denied the corporeal
reality of the living body of Christ. His entity was a mere
_illusion_; it was not made of human flesh and blood, neither was it
born of a human mother, for his divine nature could not be polluted
with any contact with sinful flesh.[287] He accepted Paul as the
only apostle preaching the pure gospel of truth, and accused the
other disciples of “depraving the pure form of the gospel doctrines
delivered to them by Jesus, mixing up matters of the Law with the
words of the Saviour.”[288]
Finally we may add that modern biblical criticism, which
unfortunately became really active and serious only toward the end
of the last century, now generally admits that Marcion’s text of the
only gospel he knew anything about--that of Luke, is far superior and
by far more correct than that of our present Synoptics. We find in
_Supernatural Religion_ the following (for every Christian) startling
sentence: “We are, therefore, _indebted to Marcion for the correct
version even of ‘the Lords Prayer_.’”[289]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account