Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
Neither in the _Homilies_ nor any other early work of the apostles,
is there anything to show that either of his friends and followers
regarded Jesus as anything more than a prophet. The idea is as
clearly established in the _Clementines_. Except that too much room
is afforded to Peter to establish the identity of the Mosaic God
with the Father of Jesus, the whole work is devoted to Monotheism.
The author seems as bitter against Polytheism as against the claim
to the divinity of Christ.[346] He seems to be utterly ignorant of
the Logos, and his speculation is confined to Sophia, the Gnostic
wisdom. There is no trace in it of a hypostatic trinity, but the
same overshadowing of the Gnostic “wisdom (Christos and Sophia) is
attributed in the case of Jesus as it is in those of Adam, Enoch,
Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Moses.[347] These personages are
all placed on one level, and called ‘true prophets,’ and the seven
pillars of the world.” More than that, Peter vehemently denies the
fall of Adam, and with him, the doctrine of atonement, as taught by
Christian theology, utterly falls to the ground, _for he combats it
as a blasphemy_.[348] Peter’s theory of sin is that of the Jewish
kabalists, and even, in a certain way, Platonic. Adam not only never
sinned, but, “as a true prophet, possessed of the Spirit of God,
which afterwards was in Jesus, _could not_ sin.”[349] In short, the
whole of the work exhibits the belief of the author in the kabalistic
doctrine of permutation. The _Kabala_ teaches the doctrine of
transmigration of the spirit.[350] “Mosah is the _revolutio_ of Seth
and Hebel.”[351]
“Tell me who it is who brings about the _re-birth_ (the revolutio)?”
is asked of the wise Hermes. “God’s Son, the _only man_, through the
will of God,” is the answer of the “heathen.”[352]
“God’s son” is the immortal spirit assigned to every human being. It
is this divine entity which is the “_only man_,” for the casket which
contains our soul, and the soul itself, are but half-entities, and
without its overshadowing both body and astral soul, the two are but
an animal _duad_. It requires a trinity to form the complete “man,”
and allow him to remain immortal at every “re-birth,” or _revolutio_,
throughout the subsequent and ascending spheres, every one of which
brings him nearer to the refulgent realm of eternal and _absolute_
light.
“God’s FIRST-BORN, who is the ‘holy Veil,’ the ‘Light of Lights,’ it
is he who sends the revolutio of the Delegatus, for he is the _First
Power_,” says the kabalist.[353]
“The pneuma (spirit) and the dunamis (power), which is from the God,
it is right to consider nothing else than the _Logos_, who is _also_
(?) First-begotten to the God,” argues a Christian.[354]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account