Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
mythology,” says Champollion, “is a triad ... namely, Kneph, Neith,
and Phtah; and Ammon, the male, the father; Muth, the female and
mother; and Khons, the son.”
The ten Sephiroth are copies taken from the ten Prâdjapatis created
by Viradj, called the “Lords of all beings,” and answering to the
biblical Patriarchs.
Justin Martyr explains some of the “heresies” of the day, but in a
very unsatisfactory manner. _He shows, however, the identity of all
the world-religions at their starting-points._ The first _beginning_
opens invariably with the _unknown_ and passive deity, producing
from himself a certain active power or virtue, “Rational,” which is
sometimes called WISDOM, sometimes the SON, very often God, Angel,
Lord, and LOGOS.[403] The latter is sometimes applied to the very
first emanation, but in several systems it proceeds from the first
androgyne or double ray produced at the beginning by the unseen.
Philo depicts this wisdom as male and female. But though its first
manifestation had a beginning, for it proceeded from _Oulom_[404]
(Aiôn, time), the highest of the Æons, when emitted from the Fathers,
it had remained with him _before all creations_, for it is part of
him.[405] Therefore, Philo Judæus calls Adam Kadmon “_mind_” (the
Ennoia of _Bythos_ in the Gnostic system). “The mind, let it be named
Adam.”[406]
Strictly speaking, it is difficult to view the Jewish _Book of
Genesis_ otherwise than as a chip from the trunk of the mundane tree
of universal Cosmogony, rendered in Oriental allegories. As cycle
succeeded cycle, and one nation after another came upon the world’s
stage to play its brief part in the majestic drama of human life,
each new people evolved from ancestral traditions its own religion,
giving it a local color, and stamping it with its individual
characteristics. While each of these religions had its distinguishing
traits, by which, were there no other archaic vestiges, the physical
and psychological status of its creators could be estimated, all
preserved a common likeness to one prototype. This parent cult was
none other than the primitive “wisdom-religion.” The Israelitish
_Scriptures_ are no exception. Their national history--if they can
claim any autonomy before the return from Babylon, and were anything
more than migratory septs of Hindu pariahs, cannot be carried back
a day beyond Moses; and if this ex-Egyptian priest must, from
theological necessity, be transformed into a Hebrew patriarch, we
must insist that the Jewish nation was lifted with that smiling
infant out of the bulrushes of Lake Moeris. Abraham, their alleged
father, belongs to the universal mythology. Most likely he is but one
of the numerous aliases of _Zeruan_ (Saturn), the king of the golden
age, who is also called the old man (emblem of time).[407]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account