Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
Already, we find Ezekiel addressed by the likeness of the glory of
the Lord, “as Son of man.” This peculiar title is used repeatedly
throughout the whole book of this prophet, which is as kabalistic
as the “roll of a book” which the “Glory” causes him to eat. It is
written _within_ and _without_; and its real meaning is identical
with that of the _Apocalypse_. It appears strange that so much stress
should be laid on this peculiar appellation, said to have been
applied by Jesus to himself, when, in the symbolical or kabalistic
language, a prophet is so addressed. It is as extraordinary to
see Irenæus indulging in such graphic descriptions of Jesus as
to show him, “the maker of all, sitting upon a Cherubim,” unless
he identifies him with Shekinah, whose usual place was among the
Charoubs of the Mercy Seat. We also know that the Cherubim and
Seraphim are titles of the “Old Serpent” (the orthodox Devil) the
Seraphs being the burning or fiery serpents, in kabalistic symbolism.
The ten emanations of Adam Kadmon, called the Sephiroth, have all
emblems and titles corresponding to each. So, for instance, the last
two are Victory, or Jehovah-Sabaoth, whose symbol is the right column
of Solomon, the Pillar _Jachin_; while GLORY is the left Pillar,
or Boaz, and its name is “the Old Serpent,” and also “Seraphim and
Cherubim.”[457]
The “Son of man” is an appellation which could not be assumed
by any one but a kabalist. Except, as shown above, in the _Old
Testament_, it is used but by one prophet--Ezekiel, the kabalist.
In their mysterious and mutual relations, the Æons or Sephiroth
are represented in the _Kabala_ by a great number of circles, and
sometimes by the figure of a MAN, which is symbolically formed out of
such circles. This man is Seir-Anpin, and the 243 numbers of which
his figure consists relate to the different orders of the celestial
hierarchy. The original idea of this figure, or rather the model,
may have been taken from the Hindu Brahma, and the various castes
typified by the several parts of his body, as King suggests in his
_Gnostics_. In one of the grandest and most beautiful cave-temples
at Ellora, Nasak, dedicated to Vishvakarma, son of Brahma, is a
representation of this God and his attributes. To one acquainted with
Ezekiel’s description of the “likeness of four living creatures,”
every one of which had four faces and the hands of a man under
its wings, etc.,[458] this figure at Ellora must certainly appear
absolutely _biblical_. Brahma is called the father of “man,” as well
as Jupiter and other highest gods.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account