Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
On the authority of ecclesiastical eye-witnesses, therefore, we
are at liberty to say that the Christian world owes its “Word of
God” to a method of divination, for resorting to which the Church
subsequently condemned unfortunate victims as conjurers, enchanters,
magicians, witches, and vaticinators, and burnt them by thousands!
In treating of this truly divine phenomenon of the self-sorting
manuscripts, the Fathers of the Church say that God himself presides
over the _Sortes_. As we have shown elsewhere, Augustine confesses
that he himself used this sort of divination. But opinions, like
revealed religions, are liable to change. That which for nearly
fifteen hundred years was imposed on Christendom as a book, of which
every word was written under the direct supervision of the Holy
Ghost; of which not a syllable, nor a comma could be changed without
sacrilege, is now being retranslated, revised, corrected, and clipped
of whole verses, in some cases of entire chapters. And yet, as soon
as the new edition is out, its doctors would have us accept it as
a new “Revelation” of the nineteenth century, with the alternative
of being held as an infidel. Thus, we see that, no more _within_
than _without_ its precincts, is the infallible Church to be trusted
more than would be reasonably convenient. The forefathers of our
modern divines found authority for the _Sortes_ in the verse where
it is said: “The lot is cast into the lap, but the whole disposing
thereof is of the Lord;”[525] and now, their direct heirs hold
that “the whole disposing thereof is of the Devil.” Perhaps, they
are unconsciously beginning to endorse the doctrine of the Syrian
Bardesanes, that the actions of God, as well as of man, _are subject
to necessity_?
It was no doubt, also, according to strict “necessity” that the
Neo-platonists were so summarily dealt with by the Christian mob. In
those days, the doctrines of the Hindu naturalists and antediluvian
Pyrrhonists were forgotten, if they ever had been known at all,
to any but a few philosophers; and Mr. Darwin, with his modern
_discoveries_, had not even been mentioned in the prophecies. In
this case the law of the survival of the fittest was reversed; the
_Neo-platonists were doomed to destruction from the day when they
openly sided with Aristotle_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account