Itinerarium curiosum (centuria II) : $b or, an account of the antiquities, and remarkable curiosities in nature or art, observed in travels through Great Britain. To which is added, the Itinerary of Richard of Cirencester, monk of Westminster. With an account of that author and his workStukeley, William
History
Itinerarium curiosum (centuria II) : $b or, an account of the antiquities, and remarkable curiosities in nature or art, observed in travels through Great Britain. To which is added, the Itinerary of Richard of Cirencester, monk of Westminster. With an account of that author and his work
Stukeley, William
Great Britain -- Antiquities -- Early works to 1800; Great Britain -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800
Thus I conceive the intention and management of this famous work, the
Roman wall. It reaches 90 Roman miles: this is distributed into nine
parts by one of the largest castles, or cities: that interval has six
lesser castles. The names of the larger, till I am better informed, are
thus: 1. _Blatum Bulgium_, Boulness; 2. _Drumabon_, Drumburg castle;
3. _Luguvallum_, Carlisle; 4. _Amboglauna_, Castlesteeds; 5. _Voreda_,
Caer Voran; 6. _Borcovicus_, Housesteeds; 7. _Procolitia_, Caerhaw
brough; 8. _Hunnum_, Portgate; 9. _Vindolana_, Ruchester; 10. _Banna_,
Newcastle. The great castles were generally 400 foot square: these held
a cohort; the lesser held a maniple, or century: the first consisted of
600, the other of 120 men; for the Romans, in their military affairs
especially, reckoned by dozens. Thus the great castles contained a
full legion, 6000 men; the lesser, or centuries, a legion and half:
the cohorts were the standing garrison; the centuries were the watch:
for the Romans did not, as at present, set a single man to watch over
an army; but they watched by centuries, whence we have got the word
of standing _century_, without the thing. This I suppose the primary
disposition, whence it was provided that two legions and a half should
be a sufficient force to render this wall impregnable; and no doubt
it was so, as long as the Romans continued here. Further, upon the
mouths of the rivers were the fleets and galleys, to prevent the enemy
from passing them in their boats, as the _Cohors Ælia classica_ at
_Tunnocelum_, or Tynmouth, as the _Notitia Imperii_ in the last times
informs us. As also, of the disposition of the other troops along the
Wall, and castles adjacent at that time. Notwithstanding the foregoing
method of planting these castles, as the regular and primary intention
of the Romans, in such regular distances that they may relieve one
another as occasion requires; yet it must be understood with allowance,
and accordingly we find it so: they were not so strict as to plant
their castles at the alligned distances indiscriminately, for that
would be ridiculous; but chose out all along the nearest ground to
those distances, which by situation, on hills and the like, best suited
the end, for strength, prospect, water, and all other conveniencies:
they likewise placed them thinner, or more frequent, as the more or
less defensible parts of the Wall required.
[Sidenote: TAB. LXXVII.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account