James Clerk Maxwell and Modern PhysicsGlazebrook, Richard
History
James Clerk Maxwell and Modern Physics
Glazebrook, Richard
Maxwell, James Clerk, 1831-1879; Physics -- History
In the above we assume that _all_ the molecules in the jet are moving
with velocity _v_ perpendicular to the surface. In the case of a crowd
of molecules flying about in a closed space this is clearly not true.
The molecules may strike the surface in any direction; they will not
all be moving normal to the surface. To simplify the case, consider a
cubical box filled with gas. The box has three pairs of equal faces at
right angles. We may suppose one-third of the particles to be moving at
right angles to each face, and in this case the number per unit volume
which we have to consider is not N, but ⅓ N. Hence the formula becomes
_p_ = ⅓ N _m_ _v_².
Moreover, if _ρ_ be the density of the gas--that is, the mass of
unit volume--then N_m_ is equal to _ρ_, for _m_ is the mass of each
particle, and there are N particles in a unit of volume.
Hence, finally, _p_ = ⅓ _ρ_ _v_².
Or, again, if V be the volume of unit mass of the gas, then _ρ_ V is
unity, or ρ is equal to 1/V.
Hence _p_V = ⅓_v_².
Formulæ equivalent to these appear first to have been obtained by
Herapath about the year 1816 (Thomson’s “Annals of Philosophy,” 1816).
The results only, however, were stated in that year. A paper which
attempted to establish them was presented to the Royal Society in 1820.
It gave rise to very considerable correspondence, and was withdrawn
by the author before being read. It is printed in full in Thomson’s
“Annals of Philosophy” for 1821, vol. i., pp. 273, 340, 401. The
arguments of the author are no doubt open to criticism, and are in many
points far from sound. Still, by considering the problem of the impact
of a large number of hard bodies, he arrived at a formula connecting
the pressure and volume of a given mass of gas equivalent to that just
given. These results are contained in Propositions viii. and ix. of
Herapath’s paper.
In his next step, however, Herapath, as we know now, was wrong. One
of his fundamental assumptions is that the temperature of a gas is
measured by the momentum of each of its particles. Hence, assuming
this, we have T = _m_ _v_, if T represents the temperature: and
_p_ = ⅓ N _m_ _v_² = ⅓ (N/_m_) (_m_ _v_)².
Or, again--
_p_ = ⅓ N·T·_v_ = ⅓·(N/_m_)·T².
These results are practically given in Proposition viii., Corr. (1)
and (2), and Proposition ix.[49] The temperature as thus defined by
Herapath is an absolute temperature, and he calculates the absolute
zero of temperature at which the gas would have no volume from the
above results. The actual calculation is of course wrong, for, as
we know now by experiment, the pressure is proportional to the
temperature, and not to its square, as Herapath supposed. It will be
seen, however, that Herapath’s formula gives Boyle’s law; for if the
temperature is constant, the formula is equivalent to
_p_ V = a constant.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account