The affair of Sprot has an obvious bearing on that other mystery, the
authenticity of the Casket Letters attributed to Queen Mary. As we know,
she, though accused, was never allowed to see the letters alleged to be
hers. We know that, in December 1568, these documents were laid before
an assembly of English nobles at Hampton Court. They were compared, for
orthography and handwriting, with genuine letters written by the Queen to
Elizabeth, and Cecil tells us that ‘no difference was found.’ It was a
rapid examination, by many persons, on a brief winter day, partly
occupied by other business. If experts existed, we are not informed that
they were present. The Casket Letters have disappeared since the death
of the elder Gowrie, in 1584. From him, Elizabeth had vainly sought to
purchase them. They were indispensable, said Bowes, her ambassador, to
‘the secrecy of the cause.’ Gowrie would not be tempted, and it is not
improbable that he carried so valuable a treasure with him, when, in
April 1584, he retired to Dundee, to escape by sea if the Angus
conspiracy failed.
At Dundee he was captured, after defending the house in which he was
residing. That house was pulled down recently; nothing was discovered.
But fable runs that, at the destruction of another ancient house in
Dundee, ‘Lady Wark’s Stairs,’ _a packet of old letters in French_ was
found in a hiding hole contrived within a chimney. The letters were not
examined by any competent person, and nobody knows what became of them.
Romance relates that they were the Casket Letters, entrusted by Gowrie to
a friend. It is equally probable that he yielded them to the King, when
he procured his remission for the Raid of Ruthven. In any case, they are
lost.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account