Japan -- History; Japan -- Politics and government
It is, perhaps, not a good defense of the policy adopted in Japan,
to remember that it was nearly identical with that which England was
compelled to adopt at the same time, and under similar circumstances.
In both countries the change was conducted by the government, and
in both the spirit of the people rose against the interference of a
foreign priesthood with the national concerns. The truth is, that
the doctrine of the Papal supremacy is an “exterritoriality clause”
of itself, which, operating in a country professing another faith,
creates an _imperium in imperio_, which becomes very embarrassing to
a government, whether it be Japan or England. The confiscation of
abbey-lands in England may be compared with, or was analogous to, the
confiscation of the lands of the lords of Japan, while informers in
each were rewarded by a gift of the property belonging to offenders of
less note. The difficulty with which Japan had to cope was, that there
was no mode of escape from persecution by going into exile into other
countries until the storm had blown over.
In 1615, after getting rid of these politically dangerous persons,
Iyeyas seemed to think that he might push things to extremities with
Hideyori and his mother. He ordered up all the troops in Kiusiu to
Osaka, and thither he repaired with a large force. He had endeavored
for some time to make Hideyori spend his revenues so freely as to
impoverish his exchequer. He had induced him to rebuild the large
temple of Buddha in Miako, and the day was fixed for the consecration;
but the suspicions of the mother were roused, and the solemnity was
postponed. The young man had presented a large bell to the temple,
upon which, it is said, that a wish was engraved that Yedo might be
destroyed. This bell is never struck. This was made a pretext for a
quarrel, and as the deserters from the castle reported that it was
unprovided, it was forthwith invested, and war entered upon. There
were many able commanders in the party of Hideyori, and the castle of
Osaka was defended so well that after some time Iyeyas was obliged to
retire and raise the siege, as he was losing prestige by delay, and men
by desertion. An armistice was agreed upon at the desire of Iyeyas;
but it seems to have been demanded only to give time. The surrounding
country was desolated, and before long hostilities were renewed; and as
a part of the army of Hideyori was encamped outside, a general battle
ensued on June 3, 1615. In the account of the Jesuits, two of whom were
present, the army of Iyeyas was on the point of defeat, when, probably
through treachery, the castle was set on fire, the troops of Hideyori
became panic-struck, and a total rout and general slaughter ensued. In
the relation by Trigautius it is stated that in no battle in Japanese
history did so much slaughter take place as in this. The populous
neighborhood, the density of the city, the lawlessness of the troops,
all combined to produce a fearful carnage.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account