Japan -- History; Japan -- Politics and government
ostentation and personal consequence--that a diplomatist ought with
such persons never to recognize any personal superiority, and ought
always to keep aloof from conversation or intercourse with inferiors,
and yet cultivate as far as possible a friendly disposition toward the
people.
Commodore Perry left the President’s letter on July 8, 1863, for the
consideration of the Japanese government. He returned in February,
1854, when the Japanese government returned for answer that they had
decided to accede to the propositions of the President, and appointed
five commissioners to treat with Perry. The treaty was signed at
Yokohama, and ratifications were exchanged in February, 1855. Although
the treaty was signed and the negotiations brought to a successful
termination, this was not accomplished without difficulty and even
danger, as, according to native accounts, a large force was collected
on the hills overlooking Yokohama, under the command of different
Daimios. These forces occupied about fifteen miles of ground between
Fusisawa and Kawasaki to the number of a million of men (but numbers
are indefinite in the East). They seem to have suffered a good deal
from sickness while lying there, and were afterward the subjects of
many jokes and caricatures. It was arranged that if any serious hitch
took place, or any appearance of force was exhibited on the part of
the Americans, a large bell was to sound, and other bells were to take
up the signal, and a general combined attack was to be made. Idzu no
Daikang volunteered to kill Perry with his own hand, so deeply does
personal feeling enter into national questions in Japan; but this he
was ordered not to attempt.
In 1854, during the Crimean war, Sir James Stirling, then admiral on
the China station, with H.M.S. “Winchester” and a squadron, anchored in
Nagasaki with the object of concluding a treaty with Japan. The last
article of the treaty was to the effect that “no high officer coming
after to Japan should ever have power to alter this treaty.” For this
treaty the admiral received the thanks of the nation through the House
of Commons. It may by some be thought a mistake not to have stood upon
the old treaty given to England by Iyeyas in the seventeenth century,
which would have been considered more binding upon the government and
upon the empire than a treaty made when the position of the Shiogoon
was once more being questioned.
These treaties were a step forward, but had this step not been followed
up they would soon have become inoperative.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account