Japan -- History; Japan -- Politics and government
Iyo no ske, a gentleman in the service of Mito, was transported to
Hatchi jio. His son, being only three years of age, is to be kept till
he is fifteen, and then transported also.
Two boys, aged four and two years, sons of Mito’s chamberlain, are to
be expelled from towns when they arrive at fifteen years of age.
The Regent, after thus disposing of his enemies, proceeded, in the name
of the Shiogoon, to reward his friends.
He wrote to Matzdaira Idzumi no kami, then the head of the Cabinet: “I
approve of what you have done, and in testimony I give you twenty-five
obangs. [An obang is a large gold coin worth about thirty-five
dollars.] You have been very diligent in a most difficult and important
business. I am very much satisfied, and will change your territory; and
as that you now possess is very poor, I will give you better.” (He also
sent him a sword.)
To the temple lord, Matzdaira Hoki no kami, were given a saddle and six
dresses.
To the Owo metski Kowongai were given seven obangs and four dresses.
To the street governor of Yedo, Ikeda, were given seven obangs and five
dresses.
To the second street governor, Ishi ngaya, ten obangs and five dresses.
To the treasurer, five obangs and three dresses.
These men had acted as the judges in the Hio jo sho, and had awarded
the punishments to the accused. Itakura was degraded because he would
not act as the tool of the Regent in executing his vengeance.
In a letter to these officers the Shiogoon expresses satisfaction with
the diligence shown by them, and on that account rewards them, at the
same time rewarding smaller officers who have been similarly engaged,
but without specifying them by name.
To Manabay, who had been formerly Prime Minister, and lately much
engaged in ferreting out these intrigues for the Regent, the Shiogoon
wrote: “You are now not very strong, and it will be perhaps better that
you retire from the weight of public duty.”
The Regent and he had a difference as to whether he was right in,
or had the power of, punishing these men. The Regent was anxious
to get rid of him, but his arguments were strong, and, besides, he
was cognizant of all the secrets of the late _coup d’etat_, so that
the Regent dared not take a stronger step than simply advise him to
withdraw.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account