Japan -- History; Japan -- Politics and government
Let us glance at some of the features of Japan’s fundamental organic
law. The Constitution proper consists of sixty-six articles, but,
simultaneously with it, two hundred and sixty-six expositionary laws
were proclaimed. In the first place, the Mikado’s person was declared
sacred and inviolable. In him continued to be concentrated the rights
of sovereignty, which, however, he was to exercise according to the
provisions of the organic law. A Diet or Parliament was created to
meet once a year, and to be opened, closed, prorogued and dissolved by
the Emperor. Its debates are public. The Mikado’s Ministers may take
seats and speak in either House, but are accountable, not to the Diet,
but to the Emperor alone. Bills raising revenue and appropriating the
same require the consent of the Diet, but certain fixed expenditures,
provided for by the Constitution, cannot be abolished or curtailed
without the concurrence of the Executive. To a large extent, the
power over the purse is thus withheld from the representatives of
the people. The tenure of judges is for good behavior. The Upper
House consists partly of hereditary, partly of elected, and partly of
nominated members; the combined number, however, of the members of
the two last-named classes is not to exceed that of those who hold
heritable titles of nobility. The House of Representatives consists of
about 300 members, who serve four years. For them there is a property
qualification; they must pay annually national taxes to the amount of
fifteen yen or dollars. Those who elect them must also pay national
taxes to the same amount. Those persons who pay taxes to the amount of
over five yen are entitled to vote for members of the local assembly.
These numbered, in 1887, about 1,500,000, whereas the electorate of
the national House of Representatives numbered only about 300,000. We
observe, lastly, that certain fundamental rights were guaranteed to
the Japanese people. They have, for instance, the right of changing
their domicile. Except according to law, they are not to be arrested,
detained or punished. They are also to enjoy the right of freedom from
search, the inviolability of letters, freedom of religious belief
and the liberty of speech, petition, writing, publishing, association
and public meeting within the limits of laws to be laid down by the
national Parliament.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account