Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern QuestionInagaki, Manjiro
History
Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern Question
Inagaki, Manjiro
Eastern question (Balkan); Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; Japan -- Politics and government
This was followed, on May 21, 1853, by the departure of Prince
Menschikoff from Constantinople, with the threat that “he had come in
his great coat, but would return in his uniform.” Russia then crossed
the Pruth on July 2nd, and occupied the Danubian Principalities as a
preliminary to her demands. On the same day of the Russian invasion the
representatives of the Great Powers assembled at Vienna. This Congress
drew up what is known as the “Vienna Note.” Russia acceded to the terms
contained in the Note, but the Porte refused, and offered certain
amendments. The Powers after a time accepted them, and forwarded them to
Russia, who, however, rejected them.[67] The Conference then dissolved.
In October, 1853, the Porte declared war on Russia; and the destruction
of the Turkish fleet at Sinope sealed the Russian acquiescence to the
declaration.
England and France allied themselves with Turkey against Russia, and
declared war on March 28, 1854.
The siege of Sebastopol lasted for nearly a year, and its fall was
followed by the Congress of Paris.[68] The plenipotentiaries of France,
England, Russia, Turkey, Sardinia, Austria, and at last Prussia,
assembled at Paris (February, 1856), and the “Treaty of Paris” was
signed, by which the following matters were settled:—
1. The Great Powers “declare the Sublime Porte admitted to participate
in the advantages of the public law and system (concert) of Europe.
Their Majesties engage, each on his part, to respect the independence
and the territorial integrity of the Ottoman Empire; guarantee in common
the strict observance of that engagement; and will, in consequence,
consider any act tending to its violation, as a question of general
interest” (Art. VII.).
2. “The Black Sea is neutralized; its waters and its ports thrown open
to the mercantile marine of every nation, are formally and in perpetuity
interdicted to the flag of war, either of the Powers possessing its
coasts, or of any other Power” (Art. XI.), and, “The Black Sea being
neutralized according to the terms of Article XI., the maintenance or
establishment upon its coast of military maritime arsenals becomes alike
unnecessary and purposeless; in consequence, His Majesty the Emperor of
all the Russias, and His Imperial Majesty the Sultan, engage not to
establish or to maintain upon that coast any military maritime arsenal”
(Art. XIII.).
The docks and fortifications at Sebastopol were destroyed by the Western
Powers; but it was allowed that Russia and the Porte should keep up “the
number of light vessels necessary for the service of the coast” (Art.
XIV.), and merchant ships of all kinds were allowed freely to enter it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account