Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern QuestionInagaki, Manjiro
History
Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern Question
Inagaki, Manjiro
Eastern question (Balkan); Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; Japan -- Politics and government
3. All control over the mouth of the Danube was taken from Russia and
entrusted to the authority of the Riverain Commission (Art. XVII.). “A
Commission shall be established, and shall be composed of delegates of
Austria, Bavaria, the Sublime Porte, and Würtemburg (one for each of
those Powers), to whom shall be added commissioners from the three
Danubian Principalities, whose nomination shall have been approved by
the Porte. This Commission, which shall be permanent: (1) Shall prepare
regulations of navigation and river police; (2) Shall remove the
impediments, of whatever nature they may be, which still prevent the
application to the Danube of the arrangements of the Treaty of Vienna;
(3) Shall order and cause to be executed the necessary works throughout
the whole course of the river; (4) Shall, after the dissolution of the
European Commission, see to maintaining the mouths of the Danube and the
neighbouring parts of the sea in a navigable state” (Art. XVII.).
4. A portion of Bessarabia on the left bank of the Danube was ceded by
Russia in order to make the Turkish defence against Russia more easy,
and more fully to secure the freedom of the navigation of the Danube
(Art. XX.).
There is no doubt Russia was beaten by the combined alliance against
her. She had entirely overreached herself and miscalculated the temper
of the other Powers. She had thought that an Anglo-French alliance was
impossible, and that Prussia and Austria would have remained neutral.
Prussia indeed did maintain a neutrality at the commencement of the war,
and the King of Prussia himself said, “I am resolved to maintain a
position of complete neutrality, and to this I add with proud elevation
that my people and myself are of one mind. They require absolute
neutrality from me.”
Austria, however, only maintained a conditional neutrality. The Austrian
Emperor, in replying to the Russian Ambassador, Count Orloff, said,
“Then must Austria be equally free to act as her interest and dignity
may direct,” if Russia was to cross the Danube, or seek to occupy fresh
territory, or not evacuate the Principalities when the war was over.
Later on both Prussia and Austria formed a defensive alliance against
Russia, and with the consent of the Porte, the Principalities were
provisionally occupied by Austria.
In England Lord Aberdeen did his utmost to bring about a peace between
Russia and Turkey, but it was a hopeless task. Lord Palmerston, on the
other hand, described the aggressive policy of Russia as follows:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account