Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern QuestionInagaki, Manjiro
History
Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern Question
Inagaki, Manjiro
Eastern question (Balkan); Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; Japan -- Politics and government
In both meetings it was asserted and claimed that the Powers
collectively had the right of settling the Eastern Question as against
Russia’s single-handed interference, England leading the van with fair
words but selfish interests.
On Russia concluding the San Stefano Treaty with Turkey, England said
that, according to the conditions of the Treaty of Paris, the Great
Powers of Europe “engaged each on its own part to respect the
independence and integrity of the Ottoman Empire,” and consequently
Turkish affairs produced a general interest throughout Europe.
Russia had committed a serious breach of “the law of nations” by a
treaty single-handed with Turkey. When the European Congress at Berlin
was consented to by Russia, England said that the Treaty of San Stefano
was not valid without the consent of the signatory Powers of the
Treaties of Paris and London. She also demanded from Russia that, “in
the Congress itself, each Power should have full liberty of assent and
free action.” These demands seemed perfectly reasonable. However,
England, before the Berlin meeting, contracted a secret agreement with
Russia, in which the modifications asked for by England in the Treaty of
San Stefano were specified. This agreement did not leave out the
bringing in of other changes by mutual consent, but, if these failed,
tended to be a mutual engagement by the ambassadors of Russia and Great
Britain as to their general behaviour and conduct at the Congress. This
secret agreement between the two Powers practically blocked the full
liberty of the other Powers and the full amount of good they might
otherwise have done. England had been one of the first to attack Russia
for committing a breach of the Treaties of Paris and London; yet she
overlooked the fact that she herself had morally broken the same
treaties by her secret negotiation with Russia, the other Powers not
being at the time cognizant of the fact.
Once more Russia, by the Black Sea Conference, had gained full freedom
on the Black Sea, now she had regained the part of Bessarabia which she
had lost during the Crimean War, the principal object of which was to
drive Russia from the banks of the Danube. The above-mentioned territory
was ceded to Russia through the influence of Lord Salisbury, who had
secretly promised Schouvaloff, the Russian ambassador, that he would
support the Russian demand with regard to that land.
By the Berlin Treaty England and Austria were invested with a special
responsibility for protecting the integrity of the Ottoman Empire
against Russian aggression—England in Asia Minor, and Austria in the
Balkans.
If Russia attacked through Asia Minor the English interests would be
imperilled; and by the disappearance of the Balkan States, then Austria
would be open to Russian immediate attacks—a consummation which would be
little desired by that Power.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account