Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern QuestionInagaki, Manjiro
History
Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern Question
Inagaki, Manjiro
Eastern question (Balkan); Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; Japan -- Politics and government
Although of German extraction, he is an Austrian by allegiance, and a
Roman Catholic. He was originally an officer in the Hungarian army.
There seems to me no doubt that his election was illegal, because, in
the first place, by the Berlin Treaty the ruling prince must belong to
the Greek Church.
Prince Ferdinand was quite ready to submit his claim for decision to the
Great Powers, and abide by the result. All the Powers except England and
Austria declared that he had no claim to the crown, but the two had
their own way, and he ascended the Bulgarian throne—another repulse and
blow to Russian influence. Prince Alexander meanwhile was given a post
in the Austro-Hungarian army. Only recently, to show the friendly spirit
that exists between Austria and Bulgaria, a loan has been concluded and
advanced by the former to the latter.
Undoubtedly Austria committed a slight mistake in her policy with regard
to Greece. She had arrogantly displayed her fleet and strength at
Salonika, which no doubt was a source of irritation to Greece. Her best
policy would have been kindness and consideration, not forcible means,
for the prosperity of Austria was to a certain extent dependent on her
treatment of neighbouring countries, and, together with the Great Powers
she was to a certain extent dependent upon Greece’s action. The latter,
therefore, was a necessary bulwark against Russian encroachments, and
was thus of primary importance to England, France, and Italy. If,
therefore, the Turks were driven from Europe, Greece would occupy the
place of Turkey with regard to Russia, and would be the only obstacle to
Russian Mediterranean advance. “I would never permit,” said the Czar
Nicholas, “such an extension of Greece as would render her a powerful
state.” Truly Greece might well be called the Belgium of the
Mediterranean!
By the Berlin Treaty the Porte was advised to cede Thessaly and Epirus
to Greece. This was done, and as the Greeks were noted for being good
traders and sailors, great progress and improvement was made in their
newly acquired territory.
It is difficult to see the reason why the Berlin Congress did not advise
the Porte to cede Crete to Greece. If the island was left alone it would
be harmless, and exercise no influence on the naval supremacy of the
Mediterranean.
However, an occupation of Crete by a European Power would to a great
extent change the balance of naval power in the Mediterranean, destroy
European tranquillity and peace, the Levant would be in the hands of the
Cretan occupiers. Again, its position would completely command the Ægean
Sea, and if properly fortified might be rendered almost impregnable. Its
natural wealth, population, and general productiveness afford ample
resources both in times of war and peace; in fact, it might be very well
termed the Second Gate to the Black Sea.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account