Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern QuestionInagaki, Manjiro
History
Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern Question
Inagaki, Manjiro
Eastern question (Balkan); Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; Japan -- Politics and government
“Russia had pointedly and emphatically declared that she would not
oppose any larger measure of liberty which the Congress might desire
to secure to the provinces bordering on Greece. There was no symptom
of any serious opposition from any other Powers. But England had
deserted the cause of Greece, because they sold it to the Turks as
part of the price to be paid for the island of Cyprus” (The Duke of
Argyll’s, “The Eastern Question,” vol. ii. p. 170).
Footnote 89:
“Returning to Greece,” said Beaconsfield, “no one could doubt as to
the future of this country. States, like individuals, which have a
future, are in a position to be able to wait” (The Duke of Argyll’s
“The Eastern Question,” vol. ii. p. 169).
Footnote 90:
The explanation of Lord Palmerston’s opposition to M. de Lessep’s
scheme, which was given confidentially by him to one of his
subordinates in the Foreign Office.
Footnote 91:
“We do not want Egypt, or wish it for ourselves any more than any
rational man, with an estate in the north of England and a residence
in the south, would have wished to possess the inns on the north road.
All he could want would have been that the inns should be well kept,
always accessible, and furnishing him, when he came, with mutton chops
and post horses. We want to trade with Egypt, and to travel through
Egypt” (Lord Palmerston’s Letter to Lord Cowley, November 25, 1859).
Footnote 92:
_Pall Mall_, September 15, 1886.
Footnote 93:
“If Russia obtained Constantinople, she must cease to be barbarous
before she could become formidable; and if she made a great navy, it
must be by doing as the Venetians, the Dutch, the English, and the
Americans did, by the accumulation of wealth, the exercise of
industry, the superior skill and intelligence of her artizans”
(Cobden’s Manchester Speech).
Footnote 94:
Carlo’s “British India,” p. 59.
Footnote 95:
Sir E. Thornton’s telegram from St. Petersburg.
Footnote 96:
Lord Palmerston’s Letter to Lord Clarendon, Feb. 17, 1857.
Footnote 97:
“Russia is divided into fifteen military districts, which comprise
also Finland, Siberia, the Caucasus, the Trans-Caspian region, and
Turkestan. The entire Russian effective force, including officers,
artillery, engineers, train, &c., consists of—
Regular army 1,766,278
Cossack troops 145,325
Irregular troops 6,331
—————————
Total 1,917,934
—————————
By adding to these figures, the effective troops not levied in time of
peace, say 100,000 men, we reach an effective of 2,000,000 for the war
footing. The Russian militia, which may be called out in times of war,
amounts to 3,000,000 men” (_Harper’s Magazine_, January, 1890), “The
Russian Army” by a Russian General.
Footnote 98:
_The Times._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account