I am touching here on a subject which, to judge from your own pamphlet, is perhaps more interesting to you than any other. In this you are right. _There is no race in the world more enigmatic, more fatal, and therefore more interesting than the Jews._ _Every writer, who, like yourself, is oppressed by the aspect of the present and embarrassed by his anxiety for the future, MUST try to elucidate the Jewish Question and its bearing upon our Age._ _For the question of the Jews and their influence on the world past and present, cuts to the root of all things, and should be discussed by every honest thinker, however bristling with difficulties it is, however complex the subject as well as the individuals of this Race may be._ For the Jews, as you are aware, are a sensitive Community, and thus very suspicious of any Gentile who tries to approach them with a critical mind. They are always inclined—and that on account of their terrible experiences—to denounce anyone who is not with them as against them, as tainted with “medieval” prejudice, as an intolerant Antagonist of their Faith and of their Race. Nor could or would I deny that there is some evidence, some prima facie evidence of this antagonistic attitude in your pamphlet. You point out, and with fine indignation, _the great danger that springs from the prevalence of Jews in finance and industry, and from the preponderance of Jews in rebellion and revolution_. You reveal, and with great fervor, _the connection between the Collectivism of the immensely rich international Finance_—the Democracy of cash values, as you call it—_and the international Collectivism of Karl Marx and Trotsky_—the Democracy of and by decoy-cries.... And all this evil and misery, the economic as well as the political, you trace back to one source, to one “_fons et origo malorum_”—the Jews.