Jewish influences in American life : $b volume III of the International Jew, the world's foremost problem : being a reprint of a third selection from articles appearing in the Dearborn IndependentFord, Henry
Religion
Jewish influences in American life : $b volume III of the International Jew, the world's foremost problem : being a reprint of a third selection from articles appearing in the Dearborn Independent
Ford, Henry
Antisemitic literature; Jews -- United States; United States -- Ethnic relations
Two momentous trips in our recent history, both of them signalized and
given their principal meaning by the presence of Jews. Not that there
should not have been Jews in either case; to insist upon their total
exclusion would be going too far. The Jew as a citizen, bearing his
part, is one matter; the Jew as a master, directing the national show,
is quite another thing. It is by no means agreed that Barney Baruch was
the only man in the United States who could have run this nation’s war
business. That is the explanation made of the high place he took—that he
was the _only_ man who could do it. Nonsense! If that be so, let us
close up the nation and hand the keys over to the New York Kehillah. Mr.
Baruch could say—“I probably had more power than any other man did in
the war; doubtless that is true,” but he had that power because he was
for the time the head and front of the Jewish group for war purposes.
If the explanation of Jewish mastery at critical moments were “brains,”
well and good, but if it were, it would be more evident to the people;
brains do not need to be advertised, they advertise themselves. There is
another reason.
The British public recently awoke to the fact that not Lloyd George but
Mr. Montagu and Sir Alfred Mond were in charge of the recent
negotiations over the German indemnities. These gentlemen are both Jews,
one of them of German descent. Of all the British Empire are they the
only two men to advise the premier in a great crisis? If they are, why
is it? The Montagus, we know, control the silver of the world; Sir
Alfred Mond, we know, turned the very neat trick of keeping the sign of
the Cross off the war memorials raised to the soldiers of the empire;
their Jewishness always so apparent. Both financiers; both the close
advisers of the premier; as Baruch to Wilson, so they to Lloyd George.
Apparently there are no Anglo-Saxons on either side of the sea capable
of managing these deep matters, if we are to judge from the war
administrations—those that have passed off the stage and those that
still linger. Lloyd George, for once stung to the quick by the criticism
of the British public of his tendency to closet himself with Jews when
confronted with a crucial question, retorted bitterly—with what? With
the old outworn Jewish propagandist boast, that it ill became people who
sang Jewish psalms in church to rag the race that wrote them! A most
illuminating defense! The world would give a good deal for a true psalm
from Sir Alfred Mond, Mr. Montagu, or even Sir Philip Sassoon, who is
soon to become the premier’s son-in-law.
In our own history, Barney Baruch boldly claims his place, he
unhesitatingly asserts that he had more power than any man in the war.
If Allenby in Palestine needed a locomotive, if the Americans in Russia
needed clothing, if the munition mills needed copper—it was Baruch who
gave or withheld the word.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account