Jewish influences in American life : $b volume III of the International Jew, the world's foremost problem : being a reprint of a third selection from articles appearing in the Dearborn IndependentFord, Henry
Religion
Jewish influences in American life : $b volume III of the International Jew, the world's foremost problem : being a reprint of a third selection from articles appearing in the Dearborn Independent
Ford, Henry
Antisemitic literature; Jews -- United States; United States -- Ethnic relations
The racial situation in Palestine just now is very delicate. Americans
do not understand it. The Zionist propaganda has always been accepted on
the assumption that Palestine is the Jews’ land and that they only need
help to go back. It is an historical and political fact that Palestine
has not been the Jews’ land for more than 2,000 years. There are in
Palestine 500,000 Moslems, 105,000 Christians and 65,000 Jews. The
industry of the land is agriculture. Engaged in this are 69 per cent of
the Moslems, 46 per cent of the Christians and 19 per cent of the Jews.
Neither numerically nor industrially have they held the land. Yet, as
the result of a war bargain, it is handed over to them as regardless of
the native inhabitants as if Belgium had been handed over to Mexico.
Many of the natives are Semites, like the Jews, but they do not want the
Jews among them.
That is a strange fact for those who use the term “anti-Semitism”; why
do real Semites also dislike the Jews? Surely Semites are not victims of
“anti-Semitism.”
The Balfour Declaration, as well as the terms of the Mandate adopted at
San Remo, recognized the rights of the native races. Indeed, everyone
who knows about the people who have been native to Palestine for 2,000
years recognizes their rights, everybody except the Jews. Bethlehem was
a Christian town, as befits the birthplace of Christ. Yet the Jews have
contrived that 2,000 Bethlehemites leave Palestine rather than submit to
what they see coming. The other races are not so placid about it, hence
the trouble. It is now that the last clauses, added as the Zionist
historian declares, “in order to appease a certain section of
anti-Zionist opinion,” begin to get a meaning for the reader. “Was the
purpose only to quiet disturbing questions until all the arrangements
were made? Evidently. It was then a dishonest appeasement! Such may have
been the Zionists’ intention, but no one need expect perjury on the part
of the responsible nations. The end of the matter will see those last
clauses redeemed by honest application of their terms to the people
involved.
General Allenby promised those native races of Palestine that their
rights would be respected. So did the Balfour Declaration. So did the
San Remo Conference. So also did President Wilson in the twelfth of his
Fourteen Points.
But Judah says, “Let them get out!” “The last clauses were added in
order to appease a certain section of timid anti-Zionist opinion.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account