John Brown, Soldier of Fortune: A CritiqueWilson, Hill Peebles
History
John Brown, Soldier of Fortune: A Critique
Wilson, Hill Peebles
Brown, John, 1800-1859
DEAR SIR: I have just had my attention called to a seeming
confliction between the statement I made to Governor Wise
and that which I made at the time I received my sentence,
regarding my intentions respecting the slaves we took
_about the Ferry_. There need be no such confliction, and a
few words of explanation will, I think, be quite
sufficient. I had given Governor Wise a _full and
particular_ account of that, and when called in court to
say whether I had anything further to urge, I was taken
wholly by surprise, as I did not expect my sentence before
the others. In the hurry of the moment, I forgot much that
I had before _intended to say_, and did _not_ consider the
full bearing of what _I then said_. I intended to convey
the idea, that it was my object to place the slaves in a
condition to defend their liberties, if they would,
_without any bloodshed, but not_ that I intended _to run
them out of the slave States_. I was not _aware_ of any
such apparent confliction until my attention _was called_
to it, and I do not suppose that a man in _my then
circumstances_ should be _superhuman_ in respect to the
_exact purport_ of every word he might utter. What I said
to Governor Wise was spoken with all the deliberation I was
master of, _and was intended for the truth_; and what I
said in court was _equally intended for truth_, but
required a more full explanation _than I then gave_. Please
make such use of this as you think calculated to correct
any _wrong_ impressions I may have given.
Very respectfully yours,
JOHN BROWN.
_Andrew Hunter, Esq., Present._
Mr. Emerson, in his oration at the funeral services of Abraham Lincoln,
held at Concord, April 19th, 1865, saw fit to compare Brown's
discredited speech with the greatest orations of time. He said:
His speech at Gettysburg will not easily be surpassed by
words on any recorded occasion. This and one other American
speech, that of John Brown to the court that tried him, and
a part of Kossuth's speech at Birmingham, can only be
compared with each other, and with no fourth.[472]
But is this comparison really relevant? Will the historian accept Mr.
Emerson's comparison of this exhibit of Brown's prevarication, with the
immortal words of the immortal Lincoln? The speeches are characteristic
of the men who uttered them. Mr. Lincoln did not begin his sublime
oration with a falsehood. Brown made a speech October 25th, which was
truly an heroic utterance and deserving of a place in history.[473] His
words on that occasion, were hurled at his enemies, the "Virginians"
whom he addressed. That speech was as characteristic of his splendid
courage, as his speech of November 2d, was of his craftiness, for John
Brown was as brave as he was crafty.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account