Knox, John, approximately 1514-1572; Reformation -- Scotland
A year before Knox wrote his melancholy letter, just cited, he had some
curious dealings with the English Puritans. In 1566 many of them had
been ejected from their livings, and, like the Scottish Catholics, they
"assembled in woods and private houses to worship God." {259b} The
edifying controversies between these precisians and Grindal, the Bishop
of London, are recorded by Strype. The bishop was no zealot for
surplices and the other momentous trifles which agitate the human
conscience, but Elizabeth insisted on them; and "Her Majesty's Government
must be carried on." The precisians had deserted the English Liturgy for
the Genevan Book of Common Order; both sides were appealing to Beza, in
Geneva, and were wrangling about the interpretation of that Pontiff's
words. {259c}
Calvin had died in 1564, but the Genevan Church and Beza were still
umpires, whose decision was eagerly sought, quibbled over, and disputed.
The French Puritans, in fact, extremely detested the Anglican Book of
Common Prayer. Thus, in 1562, De la Vigne, a preacher at St. Lo,
consulted Calvin about the excesses of certain Flemish brethren, who
adhered to "a certain bobulary (bobulaire) of prayers, compiled, or
brewed, in the days of Edward VI." The Calvinists of St. Lo decided that
these Flemings must not approach their holy table, and called our
communion service "a disguised Mass." The Synod (Calvinistic) of
Poictiers decided that our Liturgy contains "impieties," and that Satan
was the real author of the work! There are saints' days, "with epistles,
lessons, or gospels, as under the papacy." They have heard that the
Prayer Book has been condemned by Geneva. {260a}
The English sufferers from our Satanic Prayer Book appealed to Geneva,
and were answered by Beza (October 24, 1567). He observed, "Who are we
to give any judgment of these things, which, as it seems to us, can be
healed only by prayers and patience." Geneva has not heard both sides,
and does not pretend to judge. The English brethren complain that
ministers are appointed "without any lawful consent of the Presbytery,"
the English Church not being Presbyterian, and not intending to be. Beza
hopes that it will become Presbyterian. He most dreads that any should
"execute their ministry contrary to the will of her Majesty and the
Bishops," which is exactly what the seceders did. Beza then speaks out
about the question of costume, which ought not to be forced on the
ministers. But he does not think that the vestments justify schism. In
other points the brethren should, in the long run, "give way to manifest
violence," and "live as private men." "Other defilements" (kneeling,
&c.) Beza hopes that the Queen and Bishops will remove. Men must
"patiently bear with one another, and heartily obey the Queen's Majesty
and all their Bishops." {260b}
As far as this epistle goes, Beza and his colleagues certainly do not
advise the Puritan seceders to secede.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account