Knox, John, approximately 1514-1572; Reformation -- Scotland
{149b} Ibid., i. 397-412. The Proclamation, and two Replies.
{149c} My italics.
{150} Knox, i. xxvi.; vi. 87.
{151a} Knox, i. 392, 393.
{151b} Ibid., i. 382.
{152a} Knox, ii. 15-38.
{152b} Ibid., vi. 56-59.
{153} S. P. Scotland, Elizabeth, MS. vol. i. No. 80; cf. Bain, i. 236,
237. Croft to Cecil, Berwick, August 3, 1559.
{154a} For. Cal. Eliz., 470.
{154b} I assume that he was the preacher at Edinburgh in d'Oysel's
letter of June 30-July 2, 1559. Teulet, i. 325.
{155} Sadleir to Cecil, September 8, 1559. For. Cal. Eliz., 543, 1558-
1559. The fortification, says Professor Hume Brown, "was a distinct
breach of the late agreement" (of July 24), "and they weir not slow to
remind her" (the Regent) "of her bad faith." The agreement of July 24
says nothing about fortifying. The ingenious brethren argued that to
fortify Leith entailed "oppression of our poor brethren, indwellers of
the same." Now the agreement forbade "oppression of any of the
Congregation." But the people of Leith had "rendered themselves" to the
Regent on July 24, and the breach of treaty, if any, was "constructive."
(John Knox, ii. 47; Knox, i. 413, 424-433.)
{158a} The evidence as to these proceedings of the brethren is preserved
in the French archives, and consists of testimonies given on oath in
answer to inquiries made by Francis and Mary in November 1559.
{158b} We have dated Lethington's desertion of the Regent about October
25, because Knox says it was a "few days before our first defeat" on the
last day in October. M. Teulet dates in the beginning of October a Latin
manifesto by the Congregation to all the princes of Christendom. This
document is a long arraignment of the Regent's policy; her very
concessions as to religion are declared to be tricks, meant to bring the
Protestant lords under the letter of the law. The paper may be thought
to show the hand of Lethington, not of Knox. But, in point of fact, I
incline to think that the real author of this manifesto was Cecil. He
sketches it in a letter sent from the English Privy Council in November
15, 1559. This draft was to be used by the rebels in an appeal to
Elizabeth.
{159} Knox, vi, 89, 90; M'Crie, 143.
{160a} Bothwell states the amount at 3000 ecus de soleil. French
Archives MS.
{160b} Knox, i. 472.
{161a} Sadleir to Cecil, Nov. 15, 1559. For. Cal. Eliz., 1559-60, 115.
{161b} Labanoff, vii. 283.
{163} Knox, vi. 105-107.
{164} See Appendix B.
{165a} Corp. Ref., xlv. 645 (3118, note I).
{165b} Calvinus Sturmio, Corp. Ref., xlvi. 38, 39, March 23, 1560.
Sturmius Calvino, ibid., 53-56, April 15.
{166a} Bain, i. 389, 390; For. Cal. Eliz., 1559-60, 604.
{166b} Knox, ii. 68; cf. the Regent's letter. Bain, i. 389.
{167a} The date may be part of an interpolation.
{167b} This account is from the French Archives MS., Angleterre, vol.
xv.
{168} Knox, ii. 72.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account