John Law of Lauriston: Financier and Statesman, Founder of the Bank of France, Originator of the Mississippi Scheme, Etc.Wiston-Glynn, A. W.
History
John Law of Lauriston: Financier and Statesman, Founder of the Bank of France, Originator of the Mississippi Scheme, Etc.
Wiston-Glynn, A. W.
Law, John, 1671-1729
pocket-book in which he was known to carry large sums of money in
paper. They resorted to the Rue Quincampoix, and under the pretext of
negotiating the purchase of 100,000 crowns worth of shares, took the
stock-jobber to a tavern in the Rue de Venise and stabbed him there.
The unfortunate stock-jobber, in defending himself, made sufficient
noise to attract the attention of a waiter, who, passing at the moment
the door of the room, opened it. Seeing a man lying in a pool of blood,
he immediately closed and locked the door and shouted murder.
The assassins, finding retreat closed against them, escaped through
the window. Lestang, who had been keeping watch on the staircase,
rushed off on hearing the shouts of the waiter to the lodging house
in the Rue de Tournon, where the three of them boarded, took the most
portable luggage and fled. Mille dashed through the crowds in the Rue
Quincampoix, but followed by the people, was at last arrested at the
markets. The Comte de Horn was seized on jumping from the window.
Believing his two accomplices to have succeeded in saving themselves,
he had enough presence of mind to say that he feared he himself would
also have been murdered in trying to defend the stock-jobber. His ruse,
however, proved valueless by the arrest of Mille, who, having been
brought back to the tavern, confessed all. The Comte declared to no
purpose he did not know Mille; and the Commissary of Police took him
to prison. The crime being fully established, the trial did not last
long, and on 26th March both were broken alive on the wheel in the
Place du Grève. The Comte was apparently the author of the plot; for,
while he was still breathing on the wheel, he demanded pardon for his
accomplice, who was executed last.
Before the execution had been carried out, the strongest efforts had
been made to influence the Regent to grant a pardon, or at least a
commutation of the punishment. The crime was so atrocious that they
did not insist on the first, but redoubled their solicitations for
the latter. They represented that the execution by the wheel was so
ignominious, that no daughter of the house of Horn could, until the
third generation, enter any convent. The Regent rejected all prayers
for pardon. They appealed to him on the ground that the culprit was
allied to him, but he replied,--“I shall partake of the shame. That
ought to console the other relatives.” He repeated the words of
Corneille: “The shame is in the crime, not in the scaffold.” The Regent
was inclined however to commute the punishment, but Law and the Abbé
Dubois impressed him with the necessity of preserving the public safety
at a time when everyone carried his wealth about with him. They pointed
out to him that the people would not be satisfied, and would consider
themselves humiliated by a distinction of punishment for a crime so
atrocious.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account