Chemists -- England -- Biography; Priestley, Joseph, 1733-1804
“I beg that you would impress on your memory the idea that you
promised to dine with sundry men of learning at my house on Monday
next, and that you will realise the idea. For your encouragement there
is a new book to be cut up, and it is to be determined whether or not
heat is a compound of phlogiston and empyreal air, and whether a
mirror can reflect the heat of the fire. I give you a friendly warning
that you may be found wanting whichever opinion you adopt in the
latter question, therefore be cautious. If you are meek and humble,
perhaps you may be told what light is made of, and also how to make
it, and the theory proved both by synthesis and analysis.”
The discussions of the philosophic _convives_ were not, however,
confined exclusively to chemistry.
“The period,” says Mr Carrington Bolton, “was one of great activity in
the world of science; Laplace was applying his mathematical genius to
the problems of astronomy; Herschel was sweeping the heavens with his
gigantic telescopes; Galvani and Volta were laying the foundations of
a revolution in electricity; Count Rumford in Bavaria was devoting his
great energy to industrial and social economy; Hatton and Werner were
geologising in their respective countries; Haüy was systematising the
innumerable crystalline forms occurring in nature; the Montgolfier
brothers were experimenting with air-balloons and prophesying the yet
unsolved problem of aërial navigation; Captain James Cook returned
from his memorable voyages around the world, full of adventures and
novelties in nature: the application of steam to the driving of land
carriages and the propelling of boats was gradually being perfected by
patience and genius. These, together with the metaphysical and even
the political questions of the day, must have engrossed the attention
of the talented friends who dined together at the full moon.”
A picturesque account of the Club is given in Mrs Schimmelpenninck’s
_Memoirs_. Mary Ann Schimmelpenninck (_née_ Galton) was the daughter of
Mr Samuel Galton, a wealthy patron of letters and a man of considerable
intellectual ability. He was interested in scientific pursuits and was a
fellow of the Royal Society. His house at Barr, about seven or eight
miles from Birmingham, was a notable place in the social life of the
district, and the Lunar Society held some of its most delightful
meetings under his hospitable roof, as Mrs Schimmelpenninck recalls. She
thus writes of Dr Priestley:—
“A man of admirable simplicity, gentleness and kindness of heart,
united with great acuteness of intellect. I can never forget the
impression produced on me by the serene expression of his
countenance.”
In his _Memoirs_ Richard Lovell Edgeworth says of the Society that it
consisted of—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account