As may well be supposed, the object that most fully and constantly
engaged our attention during our stay in Marocco was the view of the
Great Atlas range, for which the terraced roof of our house afforded
every needful facility. The interest attaching to an almost unknown
chain of great mountains was enhanced by the hope of penetrating its
recesses. We were often tantalised by finding clouds hanging about
the flanks, or clinging to the higher peaks, as happened during the
latter days of our stay, but there was always enough to be seen to
reward our attention. We were able to identify the mountain, Miltsin,
which Washington took to be the highest peak in the Atlas chain
visible from Marocco; but we had already, during the last day’s
journey before entering the city, satisfied ourselves that there
is no summit visible from the plain of Marocco that can claim any
marked predominance over its neighbours. Travelling, as we were,
nearly parallel to the main chain, we were far more favourably
placed than Washington, who approached the city from the NNW., and
always viewed the chain from nearly the same direction. The crest
is undoubtedly more sinuous than it appears as laid down on the
map, or when seen from a distance; some of the projecting summits
are therefore nearer to the eye than others; but it appeared to us
then, and our subsequent experience only strengthened that belief,
that most of the peaks or prominences in the higher portion of the
chain seen from the plain of Marocco, in a distance of fifty or
sixty miles, attain to very nearly the same height.
Washington speaks of a base-line of seventeen miles which served
him for his trigonometrical observations, but it is obvious from his
narrative that this cannot have been measured so as to admit of much
accuracy in his results. As a matter of fact, it appears from his map
and accompanying section, and from the narrative of his excursion to
Tagherain, that Washington considerably underrated the distance from
the city to the crest of the Great Atlas. His Miltsin is doubtless a
summit near the head of the Ourika valley, which apparently stands
some short way north of the axis of the chain. According to the
scale of his map Miltsin is twenty-seven and a half geographical
miles distant from the house which he occupied, whereas it is
impossible to estimate the true distance at less than thirty-three
geographical miles. If we allow for the height of Marocco above
the sea level, and increase the estimated height of Miltsin in the
ratio of its true distance to that assumed by Washington, we get
for the height of the peak 13,352 feet (4,069·6 m.) above the sea,
which is perhaps somewhat above the true measurement.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account