Journal of the Waterloo campaign, vol. 2 (of 2) : $b kept throughout the campaign of 1815Mercer, Cavalié
History
Journal of the Waterloo campaign, vol. 2 (of 2) : $b kept throughout the campaign of 1815
Mercer, Cavalié
Mercer, Cavalié, 1783-1868 -- Diaries; Waterloo, Battle of, Waterloo, Belgium, 1815 -- Personal narratives, British
the forty horses hitherto stabled in the _bergerie_ among the poor
villagers, who already have more than is good for them. The Duke
of Wellington’s ideas of discipline, &c., are rigid--his mode of
administering it summary; but he is frequently led into acts of the
grossest injustice. A notorious instance of this I am now suffering
under, and one that makes the _bergerie_ business a mere flea-bite.
Only a few days ago, whilst sitting after dinner at our little mess,
an officer of the mounted staff corps (_gendarmerie Anglaise_) was
announced. He regretted being the bearer of disagreeable orders, &c.
&c., but Colonel Scovell, commandant of the mounted staff corps,
had directed him to show me the paper, which he produced, and to
inform me that his Grace had ordered it should be immediately
complied with. Further, that the Duke was excessively angry, and had
expressed himself very harshly on the subject; therefore Colonel
Scovell recommended me to make no remonstrance, as he could not
foresee what might be the consequence. The paper was a petition from
a certain M. Fauigny (an Italian), setting forth, I think, that he is
proprietor of the Grand chateau which has been miserably plundered;
but more particularly that the English troops now quartered in
the village have stripped the lead off the roofs, from the baths,
water-pipes, &c. &c., and sold it. This is, as nearly as I remember,
the petition. A note written with a pencil by the Duke himself on the
margin was too brief and pithy not to be remembered, and here it is,
_verbatim_: “Colonel Scovell will find out whose troop this is, and
they shall pay.--W.” I was thunderstruck at the complaint and the
decision--the one so unfounded, the other so cruelly unjust. I signed
an acknowledgment of having seen the order; and the officer took his
leave, recommending me to try and compromise with M. Fauigny, who
stated the damage at about 7000 or 8000 francs. Upon inquiry of M.
Bonnemain, he asserts that this M. Fauigny is the agent of Jerome
Buonaparte, to whom the chateau actually belongs, as we were told by
the Prussians who plundered it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account