Journals of Conrad Weiser (1748), George Croghan (1750-1765), Christian Frederick Post (1758), and Thomas Morris (1764)Croghan, George
History
Journals of Conrad Weiser (1748), George Croghan (1750-1765), Christian Frederick Post (1758), and Thomas Morris (1764)
Croghan, George
Mississippi River Valley -- Description and travel; United States -- Description and travel; West (U.S.) -- Description and travel
[91] The manuscript of the journal that we here reprint came into the
possession of George William Featherstonhaugh, a noted English geologist
who came to the United States in the early nineteenth century and edited
a geological magazine in Philadelphia. He first published the document
therein (_The Monthly Journal of American Geology_), in the number for
December, 1831. It appeared again in a pamphlet, published at Burlington,
N. J. (no date); and Mann Butler thought it of sufficient consequence to
be introduced into the appendix to his _History of Kentucky_ (Cincinnati
and Louisville, 2nd ed., 1836). Another version of this journey (which
we may call the official version), also written by Croghan, was sent
by Sir William Johnson to the lords of trade, and is published in
_New York Colonial Documents_, vii, pp. 779-788. Hildreth published a
variant of the second (official) version “from an original MS. among
Colonel Morgan’s papers,” in his _Pioneer History of the Ohio Valley_
(Cincinnati, 1848). The two versions supplement each other. The first was
evidently written for some persons interested in lands in the Western
country—their fertility, products, and general aspects; therefore Croghan
herein confines himself to general topographical description, and omits
his journey towards the Illinois, his meeting with Pontiac, and all
Indian negotiations. The official report, on the other hand, abbreviates
greatly the account of the journey and the appearance of the country, and
concerns itself with Indian affairs and historical events. We have in the
present publication combined the two journals, indicating in footnotes
the important variations; but the bulk of the narrative is a reprint of
the Featherstonhaugh-Butler version.
With regard to the circumstances under which the official journal was
transcribed, Johnson makes the following explanation in his letter to
the board of trade (_New York Colonial Documents_, vii, p. 775): “I have
selected the principal parts [of this journal] which I now inclose to
your Lordships, the whole of his Journal is long and not yet collected
because after he was made Prisoner, & lost his Baggage &ca. he was
necessitated to write it on Scraps of Paper procured with difficulty at
_Post Vincent_, and that in a disguised Character to prevent its being
understood by the French in case through any disaster he might be again
plundered.”
The importance of this journal for the study of Western history has
frequently been noted. Parkman used it extensively in his _Conspiracy
of Pontiac_. Winsor in his _Critical and Narrative History of America_,
v, p. 704, _note_, first pointed out in some detail the differences
between the two versions. He errs, however, in confusing the letters
Croghan wrote from Vincennes and Ouiatonon. Many secondary authorities
also wrongly aver that Croghan on this journey went as far as Fort
Chartres.—ED.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account