Joutel's Journal of La Salle's Last Voyage, 1684-7Joutel, Henri
History
Joutel's Journal of La Salle's Last Voyage, 1684-7
Joutel, Henri
La Salle, Robert Cavelier, sieur de, 1643-1687; Louisiana -- History -- To 1803; Mississippi River -- Discovery and exploration
Three several Authors have given an Account of this Voyage; _First_,
Father _le Clerk_, upon the Relations he had from the Fathers
_Zenobius_ and _Anastasius_, Recolets, as he was himself and both of
them Eye-Witnesses: _Secondly_, The Chevalier _Tonty_, who was also
a Witness to a considerable Part of those Adventures: And, _Lastly_,
Father _Hennepin_, a _Flemming_, of the same Order of the Recolets, has
done it more largely; he seems to be well acquainted with the Country,
and had a Share in great Discoveries; but the Truth of his Relations is
much controverted. It was he who went to the Northward, and towards the
Source of the _Missisipi_, which he calls _Mechasipi_, and who printed,
at _Paris_, an Account of the Country about the River, giving it the
Name of _Louisiana_. He ought to have stopp’d there, and not to have
gone, as he did, into _Holland_, to set forth another Edition, very
much enlarg’d, and perhaps not so true, which he dedicated to _William_
the Third, Prince of _Orange_, and afterwards King of _Great Britain_.
An Action for a Religious Man no less ridiculous than extravagant, not
to give it a worse Name; for after many great and tedious Encomiums
given that Protestant Prince, he exhorts and conjures him to turn his
Thoughts towards those vast Countries, as yet unknown, to conquer
them and send Colonies thither, to make known to those Savage Nations
the true God and his Worship, and to preach the Gospel. That good
Religious Man, whom many have falsly thought, on Account of that
Extravagancy, to have renounc’d his Religion, did not consider what he
said, and consequently has scandaliz’d the Catholicks, and furnish’d
the _Hugonots_ with Matter of Laughter; for it is likely, that they
being Enemies to the _Roman_ Church, would employ Recolets to go preach
up _Popery_, as they call it in _Canada_? Or would they introduce any
other Religion than their own? Can Father _Hennepin_ be excuseable in
this Point?
[Sidenote: M. de la Sale’s _Fort taken by the_ Spaniards.]
[Sidenote: M. de Hiberville’s _Expedition for the_ Missisipi.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account