This is the first sentence. In it he has put the Introduction, the Bill of Rights, the Indictment, a proposition to Congress to go a begging before his Majesty, and several other particulars. But let us continue with the next sentence: SECOND PERIOD. 12. To represent to his Majesty. 13. That his states. 14. Humble application. 15. To Imperial Throne. 16. To get redress of injured rights. 17. No answer. Here there is no relation between the _beginning_ of the sentence and the conclusion. THIRD PERIOD. 18. Humbly to hope. 19. By joint address. _a._ Penned in truth. _b._ Divested of terms of servility. 20. Would persuade his Majesty. 21. That we ask no favors. 22. But rights. 23. Shall obtain a respectful acceptance. 24. His Majesty will think. 25. We have reason to expect. 26. When he reflects. _a._ That he is only the chief officer. _b._ Appointed by law. _c._ Circumscribed with powers. _d._ To assist in working the great machine of government. _e._ Erected for their use. _f._ Are therefore subject to their superintendence. 27. And that these our rights. 28. As well as invasions. 29. May be laid before his Majesty. _a._ To take a view of them. _b._ From their origin. _c._ And first settlement of these countries. It is only necessary to remark on the above, that thirty or forty subjects can hardly be handled successfully in three periods. How different is this from the Declaration, or, in fact, from any production of Mr. Paine's. In the three great requisites of style, _Precision_, _Unity_, and _Strength_, where Mr. Paine is so perfect, we see great defects in Jefferson; and in the fourth, _Harmony_, a complete failure. If we now take the "Summary View," and submit it to the same critical analysis as I have the Declaration of Independence, we will find the same defects in it, as a whole, that we find in the first paragraph, which I have just analyzed. There is a complete mixture of all subjects. But this I leave to the reader, should he question the truth of my assertion. If we now turn to the synopsis of the Declaration, we will find an exhibition of the most perfect _order._ The Introduction is short, to the point, and complete. The Bill of Rights contains the _first principles_. These apply to mankind universally. It then proceeds as a specialty. The Indictment is divided into three grand divisions, Usurpation, Abdication, and War, and the separate counts are stated, clearly containing but one subject. Nowhere do we find a mixing up of different subjects. We do not find a count of war under the head of usurpation, nor one of usurpation under the head of war. * * * * *