If, however, we place the satisfaction in the object altogether in the fact that it gratifies us by charm or emotion, we must not assume that any _other_ man agrees with the aesthetical judgement which _we_ pass; for as to these each one rightly consults his own individual sensibility. But in that case all censorship of taste would disappear, except indeed the example afforded by the accidental agreement of others in their judgements were regarded as _commanding_ our assent; and this principle we should probably resist, and should appeal to the natural right of subjecting the judgement, which rests on the immediate feeling of our own well-being, to our own sense and not to that of any other man. If then the judgement of taste is not to be valid merely _egoistically_, but according to its inner nature,--_i.e._ on account of itself and not on account of the examples that others give of their taste,--to be necessarily valid _pluralistically_, if we regard it as a judgement which may exact the adhesion of every one; then there must lie at its basis some _a priori_ principle (whether objective or subjective) to which we can never attain by seeking out the empirical laws of mental changes. For these only enable us to know how we judge, but do not prescribe to us how we ought to judge. They do not supply an _unconditioned_ command,[63] such as judgements of taste presuppose, inasmuch as they require that the satisfaction be _immediately_ connected with the representation. Thus the empirical exposition of aesthetical judgements may be a beginning of a collection of materials for a higher investigation; but a transcendental discussion of this faculty is also possible, and is an essential part of the Critique of Taste. For if it had not _a priori_ principles, it could not possibly pass sentence on the judgements of others, and it could not approve or blame them with any appearance of right. The remaining part of the Analytic of the Aesthetical Judgement contains first the DEDUCTION OF [PURE[64]] AESTHETICAL JUDGEMENTS § 30. _The Deduction of aesthetical judgements on the objects of nature must not be directed to what we call Sublime in nature, but only to the Beautiful._