“Yes, for the present,” said Mivers, “one has no option. But you will see some clever articles in ‘The Londoner’ towards the close of the session, which will damage him greatly, by praising him in the wrong place, and deepening the alarm of important followers,--an alarm now at work, though suppressed.” Here Kenelm asked, in humble tones, why Gordon thought that a minister he considered so untrustworthy and dangerous must for the present be supported through thick and thin. “Because at present a member elected so to support him would lose his seat if he did not: needs must when the devil drives.” KENELM.--“When the devil drives, I should have thought it better to resign one’s seat on the coach; perhaps one might be of some use, out of it, in helping to put on the drag.” MIVERS.--“Cleverly said, Kenelm. But, metaphor apart, Gordon is right. A young politician must go with his party; a veteran journalist like myself is more independent. So long as the journalist blames everybody, he will have plenty of readers.” Kenelm made no reply, and Gordon changed the conversation from men to measures. He spoke of some Bills before Parliament with remarkable ability, evincing much knowledge of the subject, much critical acuteness, illustrating their defects, and proving the danger of their ultimate consequences. Kenelm was greatly struck with the vigour of this cold, clear mind, and owned to himself that the House of Commons was a fitting place for its development. “But,” said Mivers, “would you not be obliged to defend these Bills if you were member for Saxboro’?” “Before I answer your question, answer me this: dangerous as the Bills are, is it not necessary that they shall pass? Have not the public so resolved?” “There can be no doubt of that.” “Then the member for Saxboro’ cannot be strong enough to go against the public.” “Progress of the age!” said Kenelm, musingly. “Do you think the class of gentlemen will long last in England?” “What do you call gentlemen? The aristocracy by birth?--the _gentilshommes_?”