After recapitulating Kirkcaldy’s exploits, the poet touches on a delicate subject--the disinterested policy of England--and indicates by his doubtless sincere belief in it, the real and essential cause of disagreement between Grange and his former associates. Quhat neids ye skar, thocht Ingland do support vs, To puneis sic as proudly dois Rebell? That tyme at Leith thou knawis they did comfort vs, And maid vs fre quhen strangers did vs quell, And never socht na profitte to thame sell: Thou neids not feir, that hous thay never craifit: The Regent sayis, sa far as I heir tell, Wald thow be trew thair can na better haif it. A threat more sorrowful than angry, of Divine vengeance, if the Captain abandoned the cause which Semple and his friends still believed to be that of religion, closes the spirited poem:-- Thocht at this tyme thow haif that warlyke craig, And is in hart curagious and bald, God will nocht mys to scurge the with a plaig Gif in his caus thow lat thy curage cald. As thow may se, thick scurgis monyfald Lich vpon thame that proudly dois disdane. Except the Lord be watche man of the hald, Quha walkis the same, thair laubour is in vane. Before the close of the year 1570, an incident which was not directly connected with the politics of either party, and to which but little importance would probably have been attached, but for the intense excitement of the times, brought Kirkcaldy into direct conflict with John Knox himself. In the beginning of December, Sir William’s first cousin, John Kirkcaldy, the same in whose quarrel he had fought with Ralph Evers, was called to attend a justice-court in Dunfermline, as a juryman on a murder trial. During his stay in the town, he was attacked, whilst peacefully going to church, by George and Laurence Durie, brothers to the Commendator of the Abbey, and by several friends of theirs, amongst whom was a young man named Henry Seton. The immediate cause of the quarrel is not stated. But the two families stood on such bad terms that a very slight circumstance may have sufficed to give rise to it. According to Grange’s statement, the house of Durie had done many injuries to him and his; and he attributed the death of his father-in-law, the Laird of Raith, who had been executed on a charge of treason, to the animosity of the head of that family. ‘Since that time,’ he asserted further, ‘the Duries had continuallie troubled Raith’s posteritie and friends, in their righteous titles, native estates and possessions.’ On the present occasion, the actual aggressor was George Durie, who ‘ignominiously buffeted John Kirkcaldy with his fist.’ When the latter attempted to defend himself, he was set upon by Laurence Durie, and Henry Seton, and would, in all probability, have been killed, if the Provost had not opportunely interfered. A few days later, Seton, being in Edinburgh, chanced to meet some of the Laird of Grange’s servants in the streets, and insulted them, not with