Knickerbocker's history of New York, vol. 1 (of 2)Irving, Washington
History
Knickerbocker's history of New York, vol. 1 (of 2)
Irving, Washington
New York (State) -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
And Van Kortlandt awoke from his sleep greatly instructed; and he
aroused his companions and related to them his dream, and interpreted
it, that it was the will of St. Nicholas that they should settle down
and build the city here; and that the smoke of the pipe was a type how
vast would be the extent of the city, inasmuch as the volumes of its
smoke would spread over a wide extent of country. And they all with one
voice assented to this interpretation, excepting Mynheer Ten Broeck, who
declared the meaning to be that it would be a city wherein a little fire
would occasion a great smoke, or, in other words, a very vaporing little
city;—both which interpretations have strangely come to pass!
The great object of their perilous expedition, therefore, being thus
happily accomplished, the voyagers returned merrily to Communipaw—where
they were received with great rejoicings. And here, calling a general
meeting of all the wise men and the dignitaries of Pavonia, they related
the whole history of their voyage, and of the dream of Oloffe Van
Kortlandt. And the people lifted up their voices and blessed the good
St. Nicholas; and from that time forth the sage Van Kortlandt was held
in more honor than ever, for his great talent at dreaming, and was
pronounced a most useful citizen and a right good man—when he was
asleep.
=Chapter VI.=
CONTAINING AN ATTEMPT AT ETYMOLOGY—AND OF THE FOUNDING OF THE GREAT
CITY OF NEW AMSTERDAM.
The original name of the island, whereon the squadron of Communipaw was
thus propitiously thrown, is a matter of some dispute, and has already
undergone considerable vitiation,—a melancholy proof of the instability
of all sublunary things, and the vanity of all our hopes of lasting
fame; for who can expect his name will live to posterity, when even the
names of mighty islands are thus soon lost in contradiction and
uncertainty!
The name most current at the present day, and which is likewise
countenanced by the great historian Vander Donck, is MANHATTAN; which is
said to have originated in a custom among the squaws, in the early
settlement, of wearing men’s hats, as is still done among many tribes.
“Hence,” as we are told by an old governor who was somewhat of a wag,
and flourished almost a century since, and had paid a visit to the wits
of Philadelphia,—“hence arose the appellation of man-hat-on, first given
to the Indians, and afterwards to the island,”—a stupid joke! but well
enough for a governor.
Among the more venerable sources of information on this subject is that
valuable history of the American possessions, written by Master Richard
Blome, in 1687, wherein it is called Manhadaes and Manahanent; nor must
I forget the excellent little book, full of precious matter, of that
authentic historian John Josselyn, Gent., who expressly calls it
Manadaes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account