Knickerbocker's history of New York, vol. 2 (of 2)Irving, Washington
History
Knickerbocker's history of New York, vol. 2 (of 2)
Irving, Washington
New York (State) -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
These symptoms of state and ceremony, as we have hinted, were much
cavilled at by the thinking (and talking) part of the community. They
had been accustomed to find easy access to their former governors, and
in particular had lived on terms of extreme intimacy with William the
Testy; and they accused Peter Stuyvesant of assuming too much dignity
and reserve, and of wrapping himself in mystery. Others, however, have
pretended to discover in all this a shrewd policy on the part of the old
governor. It is certainly of the first importance, say they, that a
country should be governed by wise men: but then it is almost equally
important that the people should think them wise; for this belief alone
can produce willing subordination. To keep up, however, this desirable
confidence, in rulers, the people should be allowed to see as little of
them as possible. It is the mystery which envelopes great men, that
gives them half their greatness. There is a kind of superstitious
reverence for office which leads us to exaggerate the merits of the
occupant, and to suppose that he must be wiser than common men. He,
however, who gains access to cabinets, soon finds out by what
foolishness the world is governed. He finds that there is quackery in
legislation as in everything else; that rulers have their whims and
errors as well as other men, are not so wonderfully superior as he had
imagined, since even he may occasionally confute them in argument. Thus
awe subsides into confidence, confidence inspires familiarity, and
familiarity produces contempt. Such was the case, say they, with William
the Testy. By making himself too easy of access, he enabled every
scrub-politician to measure wits with him, and to find out the true
dimensions not only of his person but of his mind: and thus it was that,
by being familiarly scanned, he was discovered to be a very little man.
Peter Stuyvesant on the contrary, say they, by conducting himself with
dignity and loftiness, was looked up to with great reverence. As he
never gave credit for very profound ones; every movement, however
intrinsically unimportant, was a matter of speculation; and his very red
stockings excited some respect, as being different from the stockings of
other men.
Another charge against Peter Stuyvesant was that he had a great leaning
in favor of the patricians; and indeed in his time rose many of those
mighty Dutch families which have taken such vigorous root, and branched
out so luxuriantly in our State. Some, to be sure, were of earlier date,
such as the Van Kortlandts, the Van Zandts, the Ten Broecks, the Harden
Broeks, and others of Pavonian renown, who gloried in the title of
“Discoverers,” from having been engaged in the nautical expedition from
Communipaw, in which they so heroically braved the terrors of Hell-gate
and Buttermilk Channel, and discovered a site for New Amsterdam.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account