Knickerbocker's history of New York, vol. 2 (of 2)Irving, Washington
History
Knickerbocker's history of New York, vol. 2 (of 2)
Irving, Washington
New York (State) -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
Two things were unanimously determined in this assembly of venerables:
First, that the city required to be put in a state of defence; and,
Second, that, as the danger was imminent, there should be no time lost:
which point being settled, they fell to making long speeches and
belaboring one another in endless and intemperate disputes. For about
this time was this unhappy city first visited by that talking endemic so
prevalent in this country, and which so invariably evinces itself
wherever a number of wise men assemble together, breaking out in long,
windy speeches, caused, as physicians suppose, by the foul air which is
ever generated in a crowd. Now it was, moreover, that they first
introduced the ingenious method of measuring the merits of an harangue
by the hour-glass, he being considered the ablest orator who spoke
longest on a question. For which excellent invention, it is recorded, we
are indebted to the same profound Dutch critic who judged of books by
their size.
[Illustration:
THE LONG TALK AT THE COUNCIL-FIRE.
]
This sudden passion for endless harangues, so little consonant with the
customary gravity and taciturnity of our sage forefathers, was supposed
by certain philosophers to have been imbibed, together with divers other
barbarous propensities, from their savage neighbors; who were
particularly noted for _long talks_ and _council-fires_, and never
undertook any affair of the least importance without previous debates
and harangues among their chiefs and _old men_. But the real cause was,
that the people, in electing their representatives to the grand council,
were particular in choosing them for their talents at talking, without
inquiring whether they possessed the more rare, difficult, and ofttimes
important talent of holding their tongues. The consequence was, that
this deliberative body was composed of the most loquacious men in the
community. As they considered themselves placed there to talk, every man
concluded that his duty to his constituents, and, what is more, his
popularity with them, required that he should harangue on every subject,
whether he understood it or not. There was an ancient mode of burying a
chieftain, by every soldier throwing his shield full of earth on the
corpse, until a mighty mound was formed; so, whenever a question was
brought forward in this assembly, every member pressing forward to throw
on his quantum of wisdom, the subject was quickly buried under a
mountain of words.
We are told that disciples, on entering the school of Pythagoras, were
for two years enjoined silence, and forbidden either to ask questions,
or make remarks. After they had thus acquired the inestimable art of
holding their tongues, they were gradually permitted to make inquiries,
and finally to communicate their own opinions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account