There is something quite as curious touching the history of the
Garter worn by Charles I., as what Mr. Macaulay tells concerning the
George. The diamonds upon it, forming the motto, were upward of four
hundred in number. On the day of the execution, this valuable ornament
fell into the hands of one of Cromwell’s captains of cavalry, named
Pearson. After one exchange of hands, it was sold to John Ireton,
sometime Lord-Mayor of London, for two hundred and five pounds. At the
Restoration, a commission was appointed to look after the scattered
royal property generally; and the commissioners not only recovered
some pictures belonging to Charles, from Mrs. Cromwell, who had placed
them in charge of a tradesman in Thames street, but they discovered
that Ireton held the Garter, and they summoned him to deliver it up
accordingly. It has been said that the commissioners offered him the
value of the jewel if he would surrender it. This is not the case. The
report had been founded on a misapprehension of terms. Ireton did not
deny that he possessed the Garter by purchase, whereupon “composition
was offered him, according to the direction of the Commission, as in
all other like cases where anything could not be had in kind.” That is,
he was ordered to surrender the jewel, or if this had been destroyed,
its value, or some compensation in lieu thereof. Ireton refused the
terms altogether. The King, Charles II., thereupon sued him in the
Court of King’s Bench, where the royal plaintiff obtained a verdict for
two hundred and five pounds, and ten pounds costs of suit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account