The Order of the Holy Ghost was instituted by Henri, out of gratitude
for two events, for which no other individual had cause to be grateful.
He was (when Duke of Anjou) elected King of Poland, on the day of
Pentecost, 1573, and on the same day in the following year he succeeded
to the crown of France. Hence the Order with its hundred members, and
the king as grand master.
St. Foix, in his voluminous history of the order, furnishes the
villanous royal founder with a tolerably good character. This is more
than any other historian has done; and it is not very satisfactorily
executed by this historian himself. He rests upon the principle that
the character of a king, or his disposition rather, may be judged
by his favorites. He then points to La Marck, Mangiron, Joyeuse,
D’Epernon, and others. Their reputations are not of the best, rather
of the very worst; but then St. Foix says that they were all admirable
swordsmen, and carried scars about them, in front, in proof of their
valor: he evidently thinks that the _bellica virtus_ is the same thing
as the other virtues.
On the original roll of knights there are names now more worthy of
being remembered. Louis de Gonzague, Duke de Nevers, was one of these.
On one occasion, he unhorsed the Huguenot Captain de Beaumont, who, as
he lay on the ground, fired a pistol and broke the ducal kneepan. The
Duke’s squire bent forward with his knife to despatch the Captain; the
Duke, however, told the latter to rise. “I wish,” said he, “that you
may have a tale to tell that is worth narrating. When you recount, at
your fireside, how you wounded the Duke de Nevers, be kind enough to
add that he gave you your life.” The Duke was a noble fellow. Would
that his generosity could have restored his kneepan! but he limped to
the end of his days.
But there was a nobler than he, in the person of the Baron d’Assier,
subsequently Count de Crussol and Duke d’Uzes. He was a Huguenot, and
I confess that I can not account for the fact of his being, at any
time of his life, a Knight of the Order of the Holy Ghost. Henri III.
was not likely to have conferred the insignia even on a pervert. His
name, however, is on the roll. He was brave, merciful, pious, and
scrupulously honest. When he captured Bergerai, he spared all who
had no arms in their hands, and finding the women locked up in the
churches, he induced them to return home, on promise of being protected
from all molestation. These poor creatures must have been marvellously
fair; and the baron’s eulogy on them reminds me of the expression of
the soldiers when they led Judith through the camp of Holofernes: “Who
could despise this people that have among them such women.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account