It is hardly necessary to add that his morality generally was on a par
with the particular specimens we have given of it. Crowds of courtesans
accompanied him to the camp, while he deliberately exposed his own
wife, Anne of Este, the sister of Tasso’s Leonora, to the insulting
homage of a worthless king. Emphatically may it be said that the truth
was not in him. He gloried in mendacity. No other personage that I can
call to mind ever equalled him in lying--except, perhaps, those very
highly professing heroes who swagger in Greek tragedy. He procured, by
a lie, the capital conviction of Condé. The latter escaped the penalty,
and taxed the duke with his falsehood. Guise swore by his sword, his
life, his honor, his very soul, that he was innocent of the charge.
Condé looked on the ducal liar with a withering contempt, and turned
from him with a sarcasm that should have pierced him like a sword.
Pointed as it was, it could not find way through his corslet to his
heart. He met it with a jest, and deemed the sin unregistered.
There was a watchful public, nevertheless, observing the progress made
toward greatness by the chivalric duke, and his brother the cardinal.
Henry II. had just received the mortal blow dealt him at a tournament
by the lance of Montgomery. Francis II., his brother, the husband of
Mary Stuart, and therewith nephew to Guise, succeeded to the uneasy
throne and painful privileges of Henri. On the night of this monarch’s
decease, two courtiers were traversing a gallery of the Louvre. “This
night,” said one, “is the eve of the Festival of the Three Kings.” “How
mean you by that?” asked the other with a smile. “I mean,” rejoined the
first, “that to-morrow we shall have three monarchs in Paris--one of
them, King of France; the others Kings _in_ France--from Lorraine.”
Under the latter two, Duke and Cardinal, was played out the second
act of the great political drama of Lorraine. It was altogether a
melo-drama, in which there was abundance of light and shadow. At
times, we find the hero exhibiting exemplary candor; anon, he is the
dark plotter, or the fierce and open slayer of his kind. There are
stirring scenes of fights, wherein his adversaries draw their swords
against him, at the instigation of a disgusted King, who no sooner saw
Guise triumphant, than he devoted to death the survivors whom he had
clandestinely urged into the fray.
The battles were fought, on one side, for liberty of conscience; on
the other, for the sake of universal despotism. The bad side triumphed
during a long season; and field after field saw waving over it the
green banner of Lorraine. Catherine de Medicis, and her son Charles
IX., accompanied the Duke in more than one struggle, after the
short-lived reign of Francis II. had come to an end. They passed, side
by side, through the breach at Rouen; but accident divided them at
Orleans, where had assembled the gallant few who refused to despair for
the Protestant cause.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account